Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C A
Right arrow Articles by Judd, B A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, C A
Right arrow Articles by Judd, B A
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;76:F185-F189 ( May )

Renal calcification in preterm infants: follow up at 4-5 years

C A Jones, S King, N J Shaw, B A Judd

Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP

Correspondence to: Dr B A Judd.

Accepted 7 January 1997

AIM---To determine the consequences of renal calcification in preterm infants.
METHODS---A cohort of 11 preterm babies was studied at the age of 4 to 5 years. They had had renal calcification as neonates. Seventeen matched controls were also studied. Each child had a renal ultrasound scan, a calcium load test, and a desmopressin test for renal concentrating ability (RCA). The study group also had glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated, using the height:creatinine ratio, and tubular phosphate reabsorption, without phosphate load, per glomerular filtration rate (Tp/GFR) calculated.
RESULTS---In the study group the median GFR was 61 ml/min/1.73m2 (range 46-79 ml/min/1.73m2) and the median calculated Tp/GFR SD score was -0.94 (range -2.8- 0.68). Five children out of the study group had ultrasonic evidence of renal calcification. There was no significant difference between the two groups in renal size, calciuria, before or after calcium load, or RCA. Eight children (three patients, five controls) had an abnormal calcium load test. The RCA of the children in the study and control groups combined was below that of published values, with a median calculated SD score -0.71 (95% CI -1.21 to -0.23).
CONCLUSIONS---There was evidence of renal dysfunction in children who had been born preterm. Renal calcification detected in the neonatal period does not seem to be a major predisposing factor for the abnormalities of renal function subsequently observed in these infants.

Keywords: renal calcification; glomerular filtration rate; tubular phosphate reabsorption


© 1997 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. E. Kist-van Holthe, P. H.T. van Zwieten, E. A. Schell-Feith, H. M. Zonderland, H. C. Holscher, R. Wolterbeek, S. Veen, M. Frolich, and B. J. van der Heijden
Is Nephrocalcinosis in Preterm Neonates Harmful for Long-term Blood Pressure and Renal Function?
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 468 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
E Porter, A McKie, T J Beattie, J H McColl, N Aladangady, A Watt, and M P White
Neonatal nephrocalcinosis: long term follow up
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2006; 91(5): F333 - F336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A Narendra, M P White, H A Rolton, Z I Alloub, G Wilkinson, J H McColl, and J Beattie
Nephrocalcinosis in preterm babies
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2001; 85(3): F207 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health