Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 1997;77:F123-F126; doi:10.1136/fn.77.2.F123
Copyright © 1997 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997;77:F123-F126 ( September )

Assessment of total body water using bioelectrical impedance analysis in neonates receiving intensive care

Wing Tang,a Deborah Ridout,b Neena Modia

a Department of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, b Department of Medical Statistics, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN

Correspondence to: Dr Neena Modi.

Accepted 4 March 1997

AIMS---To determine the most suitable anthropometric and impedance measures and current frequency for the application of bioelectrical impedance to neonates receiving intensive care; and to derive predictive models for the estimation of total body water.
METHODS---Twenty eight babies (median gestational age 30.5 weeks, range 24-38; median birthweight 1.388 kg, range 0.690-3.510) were each studied once during the first week after birth. Total body water was first measured by the method of dilution of isotopic water (H218O). Bioelectrical measurements were made using the tetrapolar surface electrode method from four main distal limb positions (right hand-right foot; right hand-left foot; left hand-left foot; left hand-right foot), the left upper arm-left thigh position and the left scapula-right buttock position, and using six frequencies ((500, 250, 100, 50, 10 and 5 kHz). Regression models, to predict total body water, which were both independent and dependent of body weight on the day of study, were derived.
RESULTS---Resistance readings at 50 kHz obtained from the distal limb positions performed best. There was no difference between the distal limb positions. There was no difference in the goodness of fit of the models when using each of three indices of conductor length, foot, spine and sternum. The model total body water (litres) (TBW) = 0.016 + 0.674 bodyweight(kg)-0.038 wt2 + 3.84 foot length (cm)2/resistance (50 kHz in OHMS) performed best, accounting for 99.5% of the variation in TBW, with a 95% prediction interval of 165 ml. The model TBW = 0.144 + 15.518 foot length (cm)2/resistance (50 kHz in ohms) accounted for 96.4% of the variation and had a 95% prediction interval of 420 ml.
CONCLUSIONS---Bioelectrical impedance analysis is a simple, non-invasive method of estimating total body water in neonates receiving intensive care. It can be applied to both the assessment of changes in body water and body composition.

Keywords: total body water; body composition; bioelectrical impedance; intensive care


© 1997 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs