Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fok, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kirpalani, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fok, T. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kirpalani, H.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78:F3-F9 ( January )

Nebulisation of surfactants in an animal model of neonatal respiratory distress

Tai Fai Fok,a Mazen Al-Essa,a Myrna Dolovich,b Farid Rasid,c Haresh Kirpalania

a Department of Paediatrics, b Department of Medicine, c Department of Nuclear Medicine McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence to: Dr H Kirpalani Department of Paediatrics McMaster University 1200 Main Street West Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.


Accepted 20 August 1997

AIMS---To evaluate pulmonary deposition and gas exchange following nebulisation of two surfactants by either a jet or an ultrasonic nebuliser.
METHOD---After bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), 19 rabbits were ventilated in four groups. Group A1 (n=5) and A2 (n=6) received Technetium-99m labelled Exosurf, and groups B1 (n=4) and B2 (n=4) received radiolabelled Survanta. Groups A1 and B1 received jet nebuliser therapy, whereas groups A2 and B2 received ultrasonic nebuliser. Pulmonary deposition, distribution, and blood gases were determined.
RESULTS---Pulmonary deposition as per cent of initial dose and mg lipid) was 0.28(0.10)% or 0.59(0.21) mg in group A1, 1.05(0.23)% or 2.21(0.48) mg in group A2, 0.08(0.02)% or 0.30(0.08) mg in group B1, and 0.09(0.02)% or 0.34(0.08) mg in group B2. Deposition in group A2 was greater than in other groups (p= 0.001). Group A2 showed a small improvement in blood gases.
CONCLUSIONS---Even the highest deposition---ultrasonic nebuliser witosurf---achieved limited clinical effect. The aerosol route is currently not effective for surfactant treatment.

Keywords: surfactant; nebuliser; respiratory distress syndrome; rabbits


© 1998 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Y.-Z. Wu, S. Medjane, S. Chabot, F. S. Kubrusly, I. Raw, M. Chignard, and L. Touqui
Surfactant Protein-A and Phosphatidylglycerol Suppress Type IIA Phospholipase A2 Synthesis via Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2003; 168(6): 692 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1998 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health