Randomised double blind trial of morphine versus diamorphine for sedation of preterm neonates
Academic Unit
of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of
Leeds, The General Infirmary at Leeds
Correspondence to: Dr CM Wood Department of Paediatrics, Hull Maternity Hospital, Hedon Road, Hull HU9 5LX.
Accepted 14 January 1998
AIMS
To compare the
safety and effectiveness of morphine and diamorphine for the sedation
of ventilated preterm neonates in a double blind, randomised trial.
METHODS
Eighty eight
babies were allocated to receive either morphine (n = 44) or
diamorphine (n = 44) by bolus infusion (200 or 120 mcg/kg,
respectively, over two hours), followed by maintenance infusion (25 or
15 mcg/kg/h, respectively) during the initial phase of their
respiratory disease. Serial monitoring of physiological, behavioural,
and biochemical variables over the first 24 hours of the infusions was
performed. Longer term outcomes were also monitored.
RESULTS
Morphine,
but not diamorphine, was associated with a mean (SEM) decrease in mean
arterial blood pressure of 2.2 (1.0) mm Hg (p = 0.05) over the initial
loading infusion. Physiological (blood pressure variability) and
behavioural measures of sedation (clinical assessment and sedation
scoring) indicated that the two drug regimens were equally effective
after 24 hours, but the sedative effects of diamorphine were evident
more quickly than those of morphine. Both regimens significantly
reduced plasma adrenaline concentrations over the first 24 hours of the
infusions. No significant differences in mortality, ventilator days,
chronic lung disease or intracranial lesions were noted.
CONCLUSIONS
Both
drug regimens reduce the stress response to ventilation in preterm
neonates. However, diamorphine's more rapid onset of sedation and
morphine's hypotensive tendency suggest that diamorphine is preferable
for the sedation of mechanically ventilated preterm neonates.
|
Key points
|
© 1998 by Archives of Disease in Childhood
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Anand, K J S, Hall, R W
(2006). Pharmacological therapy for analgesia and sedation in the newborn.. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
91: F448-F453
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Simons, S H P, Roofthooft, D W E, van Dijk, M, van Lingen, R A, Duivenvoorden, H J, van den Anker, J N, Tibboel, D
(2006). Morphine in ventilated neonates: its effects on arterial blood pressure. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
91: F46-F51
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Bhandari, V., Bergqvist, L. L., Kronsberg, S. S., Barton, B. A., Anand, K. J. S., for the NEOPAIN Trial Investigators Group,
(2005). Morphine Administration and Short-term Pulmonary Outcomes Among Ventilated Preterm Infants. Pediatrics
116: 352-359
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Carbajal, R., Lenclen, R., Jugie, M., Paupe, A., Barton, B. A., Anand, K. J. S.
(2005). Morphine Does Not Provide Adequate Analgesia for Acute Procedural Pain Among Preterm Neonates. Pediatrics
115: 1494-1500
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Simons, S H P, van Dijk, M, van Lingen, R A, Roofthooft, D, Boomsma, F, van den Anker, J N, Tibboel, D
(2005). Randomised controlled trial evaluating effects of morphine on plasma adrenaline/noradrenaline concentrations in newborns. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
90: F36-F40
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Simons, S. H. P., van Dijk, M., van Lingen, R. A., Roofthooft, D., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Jongeneel, N., Bunkers, C., Smink, E., Anand, K. J. S., van den Anker, J. N., Tibboel, D.
(2003). Routine Morphine Infusion in Preterm Newborns Who Received Ventilatory Support: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA
290: 2419-2427
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
CHANA, S K, ANAND, K J S, RUTTER, N.
(2001). Can we use methadone for analgesia in neonates?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
85: F79-81
[Full Text] -
Rutter, N, Evans, N
(2000). Cardiovascular effects of an intravenous bolus of morphine in the ventilated preterm infant. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.
83: 101F-103
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



