Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaswon, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaswon, M. S
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, H.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F135-F138 ( March )

Prospective study of outcome in antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation

Mervyn S Jaswon,a Laraine Dibble,a Sheila Puri,a Jacky Davis,b Jane Young,b Raj Dave,b Heulwen Morganc

a Department of Paediatrics Whittington Hospital NHS Trust Highgate Hill, London N19 5NF, b Department of Radiology, c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Correspondence to: Dr Jaswon.


Accepted 11 September 1998

AIMS---To ascertain the outcome associated with antenatal renal pelvis dilatation; to recommend guidelines for postnatal investigation and determine an upper limit of normal for the anterioposterior dimensions of the fetal renal pelvis.
METHODS---Infants whose antenatal ultrasound scan showed a fetal renal pelvis of 5 mm or greater were investigated using postnatal renal tract ultrasound and a micturating cystogram. Isotope studies were also performed, where appropriate.
RESULTS---Vesicoureteric reflux (VUR), the most common diagnosis, was evident in 23/104 (22%). In 14 infants with VUR the postnatal ultrasound scan was normal. There was no evidence of renal scarring or dysplasia in any of the refluxing kidneys. Other diagnoses were pelviureteric junction obstruction, renal dysplasia, and idiopathic dilatation. Antenatal counselling and parental information facilitated postnatal assessment.
CONCLUSIONS---Infants with antenatal renal pelvis measurements of 5 mm or greater should be investigated postnatally, as a significant percentage will have VUR. A normal postnatal ultrasound scan does not preclude the presence of VUR.

Keywords: vesicoureteric reflux; antenatal renal pelvis dilatation; renal tract anomalies; prenatal diagnosis


© 1999 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. S. Lee, M. Cendron, D. D. Kinnamon, and H. T. Nguyen
Antenatal Hydronephrosis as a Predictor of Postnatal Outcome: A Meta-analysis
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 586 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
P A BROGAN and J CHIYENDE
Antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2000; 82(2): 171F - 171.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M. S JASWON
Outcome in antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 77F - 77.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
R M NICHOLL
Antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 1999; 81(2): 159F - 159.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health