|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Medical
School, University of Tampere, PO Box 607, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland, b Department
of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, FIN-33521
Tampere, Finland, c College of
Medicine, University of Malawi, Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Blantyre,
Malawi, d School of
Public Health, University of Tampere, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland, e Mannerheim League for Child
Welfare, PO Box 230, Mangochi, Malawi
Correspondence to: Dr Vaahtera email: merimaaria.vaahtera{at}kolumbus.fi
Accepted 22 October
1999
BACKGROUND
The slow
pace in the reduction of infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has
partially been attributed to the epidemic of human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) infection. To facilitate early interventions, antenatal and
perinatal predictors of 1st year mortality were identified in a rural
community in southern Malawi.
METHODS
A cohort of
733 live born infants was studied prospectively from approximately 24 gestation weeks onwards. Univariate analysis was used to determine
relative risks for infant mortality after selected antenatal and
perinatal exposures. Multivariate modelling was used to control for
potential confounders.
FINDINGS
The infant
mortality rate was 136 deaths/1000 live births. Among singleton
newborns, the strongest antenatal and perinatal predictors of mortality
were birth between May and July, maternal primiparity, birth before
38th gestation week, and maternal HIV infection. Theoretically,
exposure to these variables accounted for 22%, 22%, 17%, and 15% of
the population attributable risk for infant mortality, respectively.
INTERPRETATION
The HIV
epidemic was an important but not the main determinant of infant
mortality. Interventions targetting the offspring of primiparous women
or infants born between May and July or prevention of prematurity would
all have considerable impact on infant survival.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M J Gladstone, G A Lancaster, A P Jones, K Maleta, E Mtitimila, P Ashorn, and R L Smyth Can Western developmental screening tools be modified for use in a rural Malawian setting? Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |