Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2001;84:F53-F55; doi:10.1136/fn.84.1.F53
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84:F53-F55 ( January )

An automatic incision device for obtaining blood samples from the heels of preterm infants causes less damage than a conventional manual lancet

H Vertanena, V Fellmanb, M Brommelsc, L Viinikkaa

a Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, b Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki University Central Hospital, c Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki

Correspondence to: Ms Vertanen, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, PO Box 281, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland email: helena.vertanen{at}hus.fi

Accepted 8 April 2000

OBJECTIVES---To evaluate in a randomised blind study the effect on puncture site lesions of two different incision devices used to obtain blood samples from preterm infants by repeated heel sticks.
SETTING---The neonatal intensive care unit at the Hospital for Children and Adolescents and Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital.
PATIENTS---A total of 100 preterm infants (birth weight below 2500 g) not previously subjected to heel stick sampling.
INTERVENTIONS---The infants were randomly allocated to blood sampling from the heel with either a conventional manual lancet or an automatic incision device. The same type of lancet was used for any given baby throughout the study (2-21 days).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES---The damage caused by sampling was evaluated using four criteria: bruising of the heel, inflammation of the heel, bruising of either the ankle or the leg, and skin healing at the puncture site. The evaluation was based on photographs presenting typical categories of each outcome.
RESULTS---To obtain a sufficient volume of blood, on average 2.6 times more punctures were needed when the conventional manual lancet was used than when the automatic incision device was used. Heels punctured with the lancet had more bruising (100% v 84%) and more signs of inflammation (79% v 53%), and there was more bruising of the ankle or leg (92% v 53%) than when the automatic incision device was used. Skin healed equally rapidly in the two groups.
CONCLUSION---The use of an automatic incision device for collecting repeated skin puncture samples from preterm infants is less traumatic than the use of a conventional manual lancet.


Keywords: newborn; blood sampling; skin puncture; puncture site healing; heel


© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Shah, V., Taddio, A., Kulasekaran, K., O'Brien, L., Perkins, E., Kelly, E. (2003). Evaluation of a New Lancet Device (BD QuikHeel) on Pain Response and Success of Procedure in Term Neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 1075-1078 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs