Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A
Right arrow Articles by Ratnayaka, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jain, A
Right arrow Articles by Ratnayaka, M
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84:F56-F59 ( January )

Topical amethocaine gel for pain relief of heel prick blood sampling: a randomised double blind controlled trial

A Jain, N Rutter, M Ratnayaka

Department of Neonatal Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Jain anoo.jain{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Accepted 25 July 2000

BACKGROUND---Heel prick blood sampling is a commonly performed and painful procedure in the newborn infant. Use of a topical local anaesthetic does not relieve this pain. A 4% w/w amethocaine gel (Ametop) reduces the pain of venepuncture in the newborn but has not been tried with heel pricks.
AIM---To investigate the effect of topical amethocaine gel on the pain of heel prick in the newborn infant.
DESIGN---Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
SUBJECTS---Sixty newborn infants, gestation 28-42 weeks (median 36), postnatal age 1-16 days (median 5) undergoing routine heel prick blood sampling.
METHODS---A 1.5 g portion of 4% w/w amethocaine gel or placebo was applied to the skin under occlusion for one hour, then wiped away. Heel prick blood sampling with a spring loaded lance was performed five minutes later. The procedure was videotaped and pain assessed at one second intervals using an adaptation of the neonatal facial coding system (NFCS). No or minimal pain was defined as a cumulative score of less than 5 (out of 15) in the three seconds after firing of the lance and as lack of a cry in the first five seconds.
RESULTS---In terms of a low NFCS core and lack of cry (p = 0.12) 20 of 30 (67%) in the amethocaine group and 13 of 29 (45%) in the placebo group had no or minimal pain in response to the heel prick. The median cumulative NFCS score over the three seconds after firing the lance was 3 (interquartile range 0-6) in the amethocaine group compared with 5 (interquartile range 1-10) in the placebo group (p = 0.07). These differences are not significant.
CONCLUSIONS---Topical amethocaine gel does not have a clinically important effect on the pain of heel prick blood sampling and its use for this purpose cannot therefore be recommended. Alternative approaches to the relief of pain from this procedure should be explored.


Keywords: heel prick; pain; anaesthetic; amethocaine gel


© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Surg, Canadian Paediatric Society, and Fetus and Newborn Committee
Prevention and Management of Pain in the Neonate: An Update
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2231 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. P. Long, D. F. McCafferty, N. M. Sittlington, H. L. Halliday, A. D. Woolfson, and D. S. Jones
Randomized trial of novel tetracaine patch to provide local anaesthesia in neonates undergoing venepuncture
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 514 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health