Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER


[Advanced]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McHaffie, H E
Right arrow Articles by Lyon, A J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McHaffie, H E
Right arrow Articles by Lyon, A J
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F4-F7 ( July )

Consent to autopsy for neonates

H E McHaffiea, P W Fowlieb, R Humec, I A Laingd, D J Lloyde, A J Lyond

a Medical Ethics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, b Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK, c Department of Developmental Medicine, University of Dundee, d Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion, Edinburgh, e Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

Correspondence to: Dr McHaffie, 12 Mayburn Terrace, Loanhead, Midlothian EH20 9EJ, Scotland, UK hazel{at}mchaffie.f9.co.uk

Accepted 13 December 2000

OBJECTIVES---To determine parents' views on autopsy after treatment withdrawal.
DESIGN---Face to face interviews with 59 sets of bereaved parents (108 individual parents) for whose 62 babies there had been discussion of treatment withdrawal.
RESULTS---All except one couple were asked for permission for postmortem examination; 38% refused. The main reasons for declining were concerns about disfigurement, a wish to have the child left in peace, and a feeling that an autopsy was unnecessary because the parents had no unanswered questions. The diagnosis, the age of the child, and the approach of the consultant appeared to influence consent rates. Of those who agreed to autopsies, 92% were given the results by the neonatologist concerned. Whether or not they had agreed to the procedure, at 13 months no parent expressed regrets about their decision.
CONCLUSIONS---Autopsy rates in the East of Scotland stand at 62%. Parents' perceptions are an important element in consent to postmortem examination.


Keywords: autopsy; withdrawal of treatment; consent

© 2001 by Archives of Disease in Childhood


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Rose, M Evans, and J Tooley
Falling rates of perinatal postmortem examination: are we to blame?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2006; 91(6): F465 - F465.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snowdon, D R Elbourne, and J Garcia
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F200 - F203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J. Rankin, C. Wright, and T. Lind
Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination
BMJ, April 6, 2002; 324(7341): 816 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health