Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dimitriou, G
Right arrow Articles by Rafferty, G F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dimitriou, G
Right arrow Articles by Rafferty, G F
Related Collections
Right arrow Other respiratory medicine
Right arrow Neonatal
Right arrow Perinatal
Right arrowRelated Article
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2002;86:F147-F150
© 2002 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Effect of posture on oxygenation and respiratory muscle strength in convalescent infants

G Dimitriou, A Greenough, L Pink, A McGhee, A Hickey, G F Rafferty

Children Nationwide Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, King's College Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Greenough, Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK;
anne.greenough{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objective: To determine if differences in respiratory muscle strength could explain any posture related effects on oxygenation in convalescent neonates.

Methods: Infants were examined in three postures: supine, supine with head up tilt of 45°, and prone. A subsequent study was performed to determine the influence of head position in the supine posture. In each posture/head position, oxygen saturation (SaO2) was determined and respiratory muscle strength assessed by measurement of the maximum inspiratory pressure (PIMAX).

Patients: Twenty infants, median gestational age 34.5 weeks (range 25–43), and 10 infants, median gestational age 33 weeks (range 30–36), were entered into the first and second study respectively.

Results: Oxygenation was higher in the prone and supine with 45° head up tilt postures than in the supine posture (p<0.001), whereas PIMAX was higher in the supine and supine with head up tilt of 45° postures than in the prone posture (p<0.001). Head position did not influence the effect of posture on PIMAX or oxygenation.

Conclusion: Superior oxygenation in the prone posture in convalescent infants was not explained by greater respiratory muscle strength, as this was superior in the supine posture.


Keywords: posture; respiratory muscle strength; oxygenation


Related Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward-Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 86: F142. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
H. Dellagrammaticas, A Greenough, and G Dimitrou
Effect of head up tilting on oxygenation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2002; 87(3): F233 - 233.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Effect of head up tilting on oxygenation
Heracles D. Dellagrammaticas
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 7 Jun 2002 [Full text]
Re: Effect of head up tilting on oxygenation
Anne Greenough, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 3 Jul 2002 [Full text]
Neonatal Position and Oxygenation
Girish Gupta, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 7 Jan 2003 [Full text]
Re: Neonatal position and oxygenation
Gabriel Dimitriou, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 28 Jan 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health