Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Field, D
Right arrow Articles by Draper, E S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Field, D
Right arrow Articles by Draper, E S
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2002;87:F172
© 2002 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Extreme prematurity in the UK and Denmark: population differences in viability

D Field1, S Petersen2, M Clarke3, E S Draper3

1 Dept of Child Health, University of Leicester, UK
2 Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Dept of Neonatology, Denmark
3 Dept of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester Medical School, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor D Field, Department of Child Health, Robert Kilpatrick Clinical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE2 7LX, UK;
david.field{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk

Background: Previous studies comparing different models of neonatal intensive care have generally not been population based. The objective of this study was to compare the perinatal services of two total populations.

Methods: Observational study based on two geographically defined populations: the whole of Demark (some centralisation of neonatal intensive care but most delivered locally by small perinatal centres—48 in total) and the Trent Health Region of the UK (no formal centralisation however deliveries almost all focussed on 16 major hospitals with > 90% of the intensive care provided by 13 hospitals). Information was recorded about the course of every liveborn infant < 28 weeks gestation and or < 1000g birth weight and >= 21 weeks gestation in 1994 and 1995.

Results: Despite having a smaller population the number of liveborn children meeting the study criteria was significantly higher in Trent (Demark 461 (3.3 per 1000 births, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0 to 3.6); Trent 572 (4.9 per 1000 births, 95% CI 4.5 to 5.3)). In Denmark 91.1% of these infants were admitted for intensive care and 85.5% in Trent. Despite significantly more Trent infants being exposed to antenatal steroids their outcome was worse (median Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) score 7 v 4; proportion receiving ventilation 87.6% v 40.0% ; survival to discharge (uncorrected for disease severity) 42.3% v 35.0%).

Conclusion: The population characteristics of Trent seemed to produce a higher prematurity rate compared to Denmark. These infants as a group appeared sicker and, despite more intensive care delivered by a more specialised service, outcomes were worse.


Keywords: intensive care; newborn; epidemiological study


Relevant Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 87: F235. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D Field, B Bajuk, B N Manktelow, T Vincent, J Dorling, W Tarnow-Mordi, E S Draper, and D H. Smart
Geographically based investigation of the influence of very-preterm births on routine mortality statistics from the UK and Australia
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2008; 93(3): F212 - F216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. J. Henderson, P. E. Hartmann, J. P. Newnham, and K. Simmer
Effect of Preterm Birth and Antenatal Corticosteroid Treatment on Lactogenesis II in Women
Pediatrics, January 1, 2008; 121(1): e92 - e100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
N. Marlow and A Bryan Gill
Establishing neonatal networks: the reality
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2007; 92(2): F137 - F142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
D. Acolet, D. Elbourne, N. McIntosh, M. Weindling, M. Korkodilos, J. Haviland, J. Modder, M. Macintosh, and on behalf of the Confidential Enquiry Into Materna
Project 27/28: Inquiry Into Quality of Neonatal Care and Its Effect on the Survival of Infants Who Were Born at 27 and 28 Weeks in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland
Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1457 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. Markestad, P. I. Kaaresen, A. Ronnestad, H. Reigstad, K. Lossius, S. Medbo, G. Zanussi, I. E. Engelund, R. Skjaerven, L. M. Irgens, et al.
Early Death, Morbidity, and Need of Treatment Among Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1289 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A Jain and P Fleming
Project 27/28
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2004; 89(1): F14 - F16.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health