Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farrer, K F M
Right arrow Articles by Rennie, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farrer, K F M
Right arrow Articles by Rennie, J M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2003;88:F147
© 2003 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


AUDIT

Neonatal murmurs: are senior house officers good enough?

K F M Farrer1, J M Rennie2

1 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK
2 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Farrer, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London SW17 0QT, UK;
kate.farrer{at}stgeorges.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Aim: To show that, given appropriate guidelines, senior house officers (SHOs) have the clinical skills required to assess neonatal murmurs.

Methods: Neonatal SHOs identified babies with a cardiac murmur at routine neonatal examination. The SHOs assessed whether the murmur was significant or innocent and decided between immediate further assessment or echocardiogram as an outpatient.

Results: A total of 112 babies had murmurs at routine neonatal examination. The incidence of cardiac murmurs was 13.8 per 1000. Twelve babies were referred for immediate further assessment. Eleven had structurally abnormal hearts. One had a normal heart with pulmonary hypoplasia. One hundred babies were referred, and 78 attended for outpatient follow up. Of these, the SHO assessed nine babies as having a significant murmur and 69 as having an innocent murmur. Twenty two babies failed to attend for follow up; all were thought to have innocent murmurs. Of the nine murmurs assessed as significant, four were confirmed as such and five were found to be innocent. Of the 91 murmurs assessed as innocent, 63 were proven to be innocent, six had abnormalities on echocardiogram, and 22 defaulted to follow up. Five of the serious murmurs were small ventricular septal defects, which had resolved by 6 months of age; the other had mild pulmonary stenosis. None of these babies were clinically symptomatic at outpatient review.

Conclusion: Given appropriate guidelines, SHOs have the skills to assess the significance of, and decide on appropriate management for, neonatal murmurs. Electrocardiograms and chest radiographs are not necessary.


Keywords: heart; cardiac; murmur; assessment; senior house officers

Abbreviations: ECG, electrocardiogram; CXR, chest radiograph; CHD, congenital heart disease; SHO, senior house officer; VSD, ventricular septal defect; PDA, patent ductus arteriosus; "PBS", mild pulmonary branch stenosis


Relevant Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 88: F80. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Patton and E Hey
How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F263 - F267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Neonatal murmurs: Senior House Officers are good enough
Santabhanu Chakrabarti
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 22 Apr 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health