Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Odd, D E
Right arrow Articles by Harding, J E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Odd, D E
Right arrow Articles by Harding, J E
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2004;89:F41
© 2004 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Does radio-opaque contrast improve radiographic localisation of percutaneous central venous lines?

D E Odd, B Page, M R Battin, J E Harding

Newborn Services, National Women’s Hospital, Private Bag 92189, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor J Harding
Newborn Services, National Women’s Hospital, Private Bag 92189, Auckland, New Zealand; j.harding{at}auckland.ac.nz

Background: Percutaneous central venous lines (long lines) are commonly used in neonatal practice. The position of these lines is important, because incorrect placement may be associated with complications.

Aims: To determine whether the addition of radio-opaque contrast material improves the localisation of long line tips over plain radiography.

Methods: Radiographs taken to identify long line position were identified in two periods; 106 radiographs without contrast taken between October 1999 and August 2000, and 96 radiographs with contrast between September 2001 and July 2002. Two observers independently reviewed each radiograph to identify the position of the line tip. The formal radiology report was recorded as a third observer.

Results: The use of contrast increased the proportion of radiographs in which all observers reported they could see the long line tip (53 (55%) v 41 (39%)). It also increased the proportion where they agreed on anatomical position (57 (59%) v 39 (37%)) and there was a higher kappa coefficient for agreement (0.56 v 0.33).

Conclusions: The use of contrast while taking radiographs for the localisation of long line position improves the likelihood that an observer can see a long line tip and reduces inter-observer variability. Even using contrast, precise localisation of a long line tip can be difficult.


Keywords: infant; newborn; central catheterisation; contrast media; observer variation


Relevant Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 89: F1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A M Groves, C A Kuschel, and M R Battin
Neonatal long lines: localisation with colour Doppler ultrasonography
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2005; 90(1): F5 - F5.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health