Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snowdon, C
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snowdon, C
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, J
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2004;89:F200
© 2004 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


REVIEW

Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature

C Snowdon1,2, D R Elbourne1, J Garcia1

1 Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
2 Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
C Snowdon
Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK; cms1000{at}cam.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Perinatal postmortem rates are declining world wide. In the United Kingdom, perinatal pathology has recently been seriously undermined by controversy. There are important consequences for perinatal trials that include pathology studies. This review looks at the reasons for the decline in perinatal postmortem examinations and the effects on research.


Keywords: pathology; post mortem examinations; randomised controlled trials; attitudes; consent




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
Perinatal postmortems: professionals, parents, and clinical trials
J. Clin. Pathol., July 1, 2004; 57(7): 701 - 701.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M McDermott
The continuing decline of autopsies in clinical trials: is there any way back?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F198 - F199.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snowdon, D R Elbourne, and J Garcia
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of neonatologists and pathologists
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F204 - F207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snowdon, D R Elbourne, and J Garcia
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2004; 89(3): F208 - F211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health