| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Scotland, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Stenson
Neonatal Unit, Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary, Little France, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, Scotland, UK; ben.stenson{at}luht.scot.nhs.uk
Objectives: To investigate the recollections of parents consenting for their infants to be research subjects and determine their views about the need for consent.
Subjects: Parents of 154 sick newborn infants enrolled in a randomised trial in the early neonatal period. All parents had given written consent and received printed information.
Methods: A questionnaire and accompanying letter was sent to the parental home 18 months later. Non-responders were sent a further questionnaire and letter.
Results: Response rate was 64% (99/154). Some respondents (12%) did not remember being asked to consent to their baby joining a study, and a further 6% were unsure. Most of the respondents (79%) were happy, 13% neutral, and 8% unhappy with their decision to give consent. None felt heavy pressure to agree. Entering the trial caused 24% of respondents to feel more anxious, 56% neutral, and 20% less anxious about their baby. Most of the respondents (83%) would be unhappy to forgo the consent process for trials passed by the institutional ethics committee.
Conclusions: A significant proportion of parents who give written consent for a trial in the early neonatal period do not later remember having done so. Parents who have had experience of neonatal research would be unhappy for their baby to be enrolled in a study that had ethics committee approval without their consent being obtained.
Keywords: informed consent; ethics; parents; controlled trials; research
Relevant Article
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 89: F283.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Maayan-Metzger, P. Kedem-Friedrich, and J. Kuint Motivations of Mothers to Enroll Their Newborn Infants in General Clinical Research on Well-Infant Care and Development Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e590 - e596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Eder, A. D. Yamokoski, P. W. Wittmann, and E. D. Kodish Improving Informed Consent: Suggestions From Parents of Children With Leukemia Pediatrics, April 1, 2007; 119(4): e849 - e859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L McKechnie and A B Gill Consent for neonatal research. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2006; 91(5): F374 - F376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Ward Platt Participation in multiple neonatal research studies Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2005; 90(3): F191 - f191. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C J Morley, R Lau, P G Davis, and C Morse What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2005; 90(3): F225 - f228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K S Hoehn, G Wernovsky, J Rychik, J W Gaynor, T L Spray, C Feudtner, and R M Nelson What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2005; 90(3): F267 - f269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Marcovitch What's new this month in BMJ Journals BMJ, August 14, 2004; 329(7462): 370 - 370. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |
