Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, R
Right arrow Articles by Larcher, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roy, R
Right arrow Articles by Larcher, V
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2004;89:F527-F530
© 2004 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Decision making and modes of death in a tertiary neonatal unit

R Roy1, N Aladangady2, K Costeloe2, V Larcher3

1 Homerton University Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK
2 Barts and the London Queen Mary’s School of Medicine and Dentistry/Homerton University Hospital, London, UK
3 Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Aladangady
SCBU, Homerton University Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK; n.aladangady{at}qmul.ac.uk

Aims: To study the frequency and reason for withdrawal/withholding of life sustaining treatment (LST) and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in infants who died in a tertiary neonatal unit.

Methods: Infants who died at Homerton University Hospital between January 1998 and September 2001 were studied by retrospective analysis of patient records.

Results: The case notes of 71 (84%) of 85 infants who died were studied. Mode of death was withdrawal of LST in 28 (40%), DNR in 11 (15%), withholding of LST in two (3%), and natural in 30 (42%) infants. Withdrawal of LST was discussed with the parents of 39 seriously ill infants; 28 (72%) parents agreed. There was no difference in birth weight and gestational age of babies whose parents agreed or refused withdrawal of LST. White and Afro-Caribbean parents and those from the Indian subcontinent (20 of 23) were more likely to agree to withdrawal of LST than Black African or Jewish (eight of 16, p = 0.015) parents. The median age at withdrawal of LST was 4 days (range 1–57). The median duration between discussion and the parents agreeing to withdrawal of LST was 165 minutes (range 30–2160), and median duration between withdrawal of LST and death was 22 minutes (range 5–210). The most common reason for withdrawal of LST was complications of extreme prematurity (68%).

Conclusion: The most common mode of death was withdrawal of LST, and the most common reason was complications of extreme prematurity. The ethnic and cultural background of the parents influenced agreement to withdrawal of LST.


Abbreviations: DNR, do not resuscitate; LST, life sustaining treatment

Keywords: do not resuscitate order; ethnicity; postmortem examination; withdrawal of life sustaining treatment; withholding of life sustaining treatment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. A. E. Verhagen, M. A. H. van der Hoeven, R. C. van Meerveld, and P. J. J. Sauer
Physician Medical Decision-making at the End of Life in Newborns: Insight Into Implementation at 2 Dutch Centers
Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): e20 - e28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D J Wilkinson, J J Fitzsimons, P A Dargaville, N T Campbell, P M Loughnan, P N McDougall, and J F Mills
Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: changing patterns of end of life care over two decades.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F268 - F271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health