Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dorling, J S
Right arrow Articles by Manktelow, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dorling, J S
Right arrow Articles by Manktelow, B
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F11-F16
© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


REVIEW

Neonatal disease severity scoring systems

J S Dorling1, D J Field1, B Manktelow2

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Neonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Dorling
Neonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK; JSD10{at}le.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Illness severity scores have become widely used in neonatal intensive care. Primarily this has been to adjust the mortality observed in a particular hospital or population for the morbidity of their infants, and hence allow standardised comparisons to be performed. However, although risk correction has become relatively commonplace in relation to audit and research involving groups of infants, the use of such scores in giving prognostic information to parents, about their baby, has been much more limited. The strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods of disease severity correction in the newborn are presented in this review.


Abbreviations: Az, area under the ROC curve; CRIB, clinical risk index for babies; FIO2, fractional inspired concentration of oxygen; NBRS, neurobiological risk score; NTISS, neonatal therapeutic intervention scoring system; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve; SNAP, score for neonatal acute physiology; SNAP-PE, score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension; VLBW, very low birthweight

Keywords: risk score; survival; prediction; risk correction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J. S Dorling and D. J Field
Value and validity of neonatal disease severity scoring systems
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2008; 93(2): F80 - F82.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
V. M. Kamoji, J. S. Dorling, B. N. Manktelow, E. S. Draper, and D. J. Field
Extremely Growth-Retarded Infants: Is There a Viability Centile?
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 758 - 763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Neonatal disease severity score systems: more points for debate?
Giuseppe Latini, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health