Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F11-F16; doi:10.1136/adc.2003.048488
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F11-F16
© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition

REVIEW

Neonatal disease severity scoring systems

J S Dorling1, D J Field1 and B Manktelow2

1 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Neonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22–28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Dorling
Neonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK; JSD10{at}le.ac.uk

ABSTRACT

Illness severity scores have become widely used in neonatal intensive care. Primarily this has been to adjust the mortality observed in a particular hospital or population for the morbidity of their infants, and hence allow standardised comparisons to be performed. However, although risk correction has become relatively commonplace in relation to audit and research involving groups of infants, the use of such scores in giving prognostic information to parents, about their baby, has been much more limited. The strengths and weaknesses of the existing methods of disease severity correction in the newborn are presented in this review.

Abbreviations: Az, area under the ROC curve; CRIB, clinical risk index for babies; FIO2, fractional inspired concentration of oxygen; NBRS, neurobiological risk score; NTISS, neonatal therapeutic intervention scoring system; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve; SNAP, score for neonatal acute physiology; SNAP-PE, score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension; VLBW, very low birthweight

Keywords: risk score; survival; prediction; risk correction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dorling, J. S, Field, D. J (2008). Value and validity of neonatal disease severity scoring systems. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 93: F80-F82 [Full Text]  
  • Kamoji, V. M., Dorling, J. S., Manktelow, B. N., Draper, E. S., Field, D. J. (2006). Extremely Growth-Retarded Infants: Is There a Viability Centile?. Pediatrics 118: 758-763 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Neonatal disease severity score systems: more points for debate?
Giuseppe Latini, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 10 Jan 2005 [Full text]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs