Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darlow, B A
Right arrow Articles by Winterbourn, C C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darlow, B A
Right arrow Articles by Winterbourn, C C
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F117-F122
© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Vitamin C supplementation in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial

B A Darlow1, H Buss2, F McGill1, L Fletcher3, P Graham3, C C Winterbourn2

1 Departments of Paediatrics, Christchurch School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand
2 Department of Pathology, Christchurch School of Medicine
3 Public Health and General Practice, Christchurch School of Medicine

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Darlow
Department of Paediatrics, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, New Zealand; brian.darlow{at}chmeds.ac.nz

Objective: To determine whether regulating vitamin C (ascorbic acid: AA) intake to achieve higher or lower plasma concentrations was associated with improved clinical outcome.

Design: A double blind, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit at Christchurch Women’s Hospital.

Patients: Infants with birth weight <1500 g or gestation <32 weeks, admitted to the unit within 48 hours of birth.

Intervention: Infants were randomised to one of three protocols with regard to AA supplementation for the first 28 days of life: group LL received low supplementation throughout; group LH received low until day 10 and then high: group HH received high throughout.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were oxygen requirement at 28 days and 36 weeks postmenstrual age, total days supplemental oxygen, and retinopathy of prematurity. AA concentrations were measured at study entry (day 2), and days 10, 21, and 28.

Results: A total of 119 infants were enrolled over 24 months (mean gestation 28.4 weeks; birth weight 1161 g). Six infants died, and these had significantly higher AA concentrations before randomisation than surviving infants (116 µmol/l (95% confidence interval 90 to 142) v 51 µmol/l (45 to 58), p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between the groups. However, the proportion of surviving infants with an oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age in group HH (19%) was half that in group LL (41%) (p = 0.06).

Conclusions: In a randomised controlled trial, no significant benefits or harmful effects were associated with treatment allocation to higher or lower AA supplementation throughout the first 28 days of life.


Abbreviations: AA, ascorbic acid; CRIB, clinical risk index for babies; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity

Keywords: bronchopulmonary dysplasia; protein carbonyls; retinopathy of prematurity; very preterm infant; vitamin C




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
C. E. P. Trindade
International Perspectives: Microelements and Vitamins in the Nutrition of Very Low-birthweight Preterm Infants: A Brazilian Perspective
NeoReviews, January 1, 2007; 8(1): e3 - e13.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health