© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition
REVIEW
Resuscitation of the preterm infant against parental wishes
1 Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
2 Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Childrens Hospital, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
3 Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Paris
Department of Theology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA; john.paris{at}bc.edu
Over the past 40 years, the norms on who is to make treatment decisions for newborns, and on what standards, have been significantly altered and revised. Today the standard for treatment of newborns is the "best interest" of the child. A recent ruling of the Texas Supreme Court authorising a doctor to resuscitate a potentially viable very premature newborn over the parents objection is a challenge to that standard.
Keywords: resuscitation; preterm infant; parental wishes; emergent circumstances
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kaempf, J. W., Tomlinson, M. W., Campbell, B., Ferguson, L., Stewart, V. T.
(2009). Counseling Pregnant Women Who May Deliver Extremely Premature Infants: Medical Care Guidelines, Family Choices, and Neonatal Outcomes. Pediatrics
123: 1509-1515
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
Kaempf, J. W., Tomlinson, M. W.
(2006). Advocating for the Very Preterm Infant: In Reply. Pediatrics
118: 430-432
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



