Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Web-only appendix
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2004.056317v1
90/4/F294    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nestaas, E
Right arrow Articles by Wathne, K-O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nestaas, E
Right arrow Articles by Wathne, K-O
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F294-FF300
© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Aminoglycoside extended interval dosing in neonates is safe and effective: a meta-analysis

E Nestaas1,2, H-J Bangstad2, L Sandvik3, K-O Wathne2

1 Department of Paediatrics, Hospital of Vestfold, Tønsberg, Norway
2 Department of Paediatrics, Ullevål University Hospital, Norway
3 Centre for Clinical Research, Ullevål University Hospital

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Nestaas
Department of Paediatrics, Hospital of Vestfold, PO Box 2168, Tønsberg 3103, Norway; eirikpda{at}start.no

Objectives: To review the evidence from controlled clinical trials of neonates given equal daily aminoglycoside doses as extended interval dosing (dosage interval typically 24 hours in term and 36–48 hours in immature neonates) compared with traditional dosing (dosage interval typically 8–12 hours in term and 12–24 hours in immature neonates).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials found in electronic databases, trial registers, and references in reviews and selected trials.

Settings: The selected trials were blinded and assessed for methodological quality. Each trial’s own predefined criteria for treatment failure, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and therapeutic serum drug concentrations were used.

Subjects: Controlled trials of neonatal aminoglycoside treatment in which equal aminoglycoside daily doses were given at traditional and extended dosage intervals.

Main outcome measures: Serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range. Treatment failure and toxicity.

Results: Sixteen trials involving 823 neonates met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Twelve trials involving 698 neonates were included in the meta-analysis of the pharmacokinetics. Compared with traditional dosing, extended interval dosing was associated with a significantly lower risk of both peak (summary risk ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.94) and trough (0.36, 0.25 to 0.56) serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range. Accurate information on treatment failure was obtained in nine trials involving 555 neonates. One trial reported treatment failure. In this trial two neonates in the traditional dosing group did not respond to treatment within 72 hours. Nephrotoxicity was investigated in 589 neonates in 12 trials and ototoxicity in 210 neonates in four trials, with no significant differences between the two dosing regimens.

Conclusions: Extended interval dosing of aminoglycosides in neonates is safe and effective, with a reduced risk of serum drug concentrations outside the therapeutic range.


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EID, extended interval dosing, typically 4–5 mg/kg gentamicin given to neonates at dosage interval 24 hours or longer; SDC, serum drug concentration; TD, traditional dosing, typically 2–3 mg/kg gentamicin given to neonates at dosage interval 8–24 hours

Keywords: aminoglycosides; drug dosing; meta-analysis; sepsis


Relevant Article

Fantoms
Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F283. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
K. Allegaert, I. Scheers, E. Adams, G. Brajanoski, V. Cossey, and B. J. Anderson
Cerebrospinal Fluid Compartmental Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Neonates
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., June 1, 2008; 52(6): 1934 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
Is a once daily dose of gentamicin safe and effective in the treatment of uti in infants and children?
Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 823 - 824.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
P M Loughnan
Single daily dose aminoglycosides in the neonatal period appear to be effective: but are they safe?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2006; 91(2): F156 - F156.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A J B Emmerson and N E Edi-Osagie
Reducing the dosing frequency of aminoglycosides can increase errors.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 2006; 91(2): F155 - F156.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Single daily dose aminoglycosides in the neonatal period appear to be effective: but are they safe?
Peter M Loughnan, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 20 Jul 2005 [Full text]
Aminoglycoside extended interval dosing in neonates is safe and effective.
Eirik Nestaas
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 3 Apr 2006 [Full text]
Gentamicin and Amikacin: extended interval dosing in neonates.
Paulo Arturo Caceres Guido, et al.
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 5 Jun 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health