Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 29 April 2005. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.059287
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F401-F405
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2004.059287v1
90/5/F401    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harling, A E
Right arrow Articles by Yoxall, C W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harling, A E
Right arrow Articles by Yoxall, C W

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Does the use of 50% oxygen at birth in preterm infants reduce lung injury?

A E Harling1, M W Beresford1, G S Vince2, M Bates2, C W Yoxall1

1 NICU, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
2 Immunology Department, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Miss Harling
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK; Elizabeth.Harling{at}lwh-tr.nwest.nhs.uk

Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia is an inflammatory fibrotic condition produced as a consequence of injurious influences in the neonatal lung. Exposing the premature lung to high concentrations of oxygen is thought to play an important part in lung injury pathogenesis.

Objective: To see if the amount of oxygen used during resuscitation at birth triggers events that lead to the subsequent lung injury and if a reduction in oxygen used leads to a reduction in lung injury.

Method: The outcomes of newborn babies less than 31 weeks gestation who were resuscitated using either 50% or 100% oxygen were examined. Eight of the babies receiving 50% oxygen required an increase in their oxygen concentration. Evidence of pulmonary inflammation was determined by quantifying interleukin 6, 1ß, and 10 and tumour necrosis factor {alpha} in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: There were no significant differences in any of the cytokines studied in either of the groups. Death occurred in 5/26 (19%) babies who received 100% oxygen and 4/26 (15%) babies who received 50% oxygen. Survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks postmenstrual age occurred in 14/26 (54%) and 13/26 (50%).

Conclusion: Reducing the oxygen to 50% at resuscitation did not influence either short or long term outcomes, but a small benefit could not be excluded. There was no increase in adverse clinical outcomes in babies who received 100% oxygen.


Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; IL, interleukin; PIP, peak inspiratory pressure; ROS, reactive oxygen species; TNF{alpha}, tumour necrosis factor {alpha}

Keywords: bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; bronchopulmonary dysplasia; cytokines; oxygen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C P F O'Donnell, A T Gibson, and P G Davis
Pinching, electrocution, ravens' beaks, and positive pressure ventilation: a brief history of neonatal resuscitation.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2006; 91(5): F369 - F373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health