REVIEW
Withholding and withdrawing of life sustaining treatment in the newborn
Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter and Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8BX, Devon, UK
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
J Tripp
Child Health, Peninsula Medical School, Church Lane Heavitree, Exeter EX2 5SQ, UK; jhtripp{at}ex.ac.uk
The rapid progress of medical technology has resulted in more opportunities to maintain the life of infants in serious and potentially life threatening situations. Whether to treat such infants is a common dilemma. The burden of these difficult decisions rests almost equally on distraught parents and relatives and on the professional staff of neonatal units. Sometimes, either parents or care teams choose to seek a decision from the courts. Ways of reaching the best possible and most inclusive consensus decisions are examined in this review.
|
View this table: [in a new window] Table 1 Doctor-patient relationship |
Keywords: ethics; treatment withdrawal
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Verhagen, A. A. E., de Vos, M., Dorscheidt, J. H. H. M., Engels, B., Hubben, J. H., Sauer, P. J.
(2009). Conflicts About End-of-Life Decisions in NICUs in the Netherlands. Pediatrics
124: e112-e119
[Abstract] [Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.



