Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 20 January 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.087668
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F166-F168
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for the relief of pain in screening for retinopathy of prematurity: a randomised controlled trial

E M Boyle1, Y Freer1, Z Khan-Orakzai1, M Watkinson2, E Wright3, J R Ainsworth4 and N McIntosh1

1 Neonatal Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
2 Neonatal Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
3 Princess Alexandra Eye Pavilion, Edinburgh
4 Department of Ophthalmology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Boyle
McMaster University Medical Centre, Department of Pediatrics, Room 4G40, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9, Canada; emboyle{at}doctors.org.uk

Background: Screening is necessary for infants at risk of retinopathy of prematurity. Despite local anaesthetic drops, infants find eye examinations distressing, displaying behavioural and physiological changes indicating acute pain. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive sucking reduce pain responses associated with invasive procedures.

Objective: To evaluate the use of oral sucrose and/or pacifier for reducing pain responses during eye examinations.

Methods: Forty infants <32 weeks gestation or <1500 g birth weight, in two neonatal units, were randomised to one of four interventions administered two minutes before their first screening examination: 1 ml sterile water as placebo (group 1, n = 10), 1 ml 33% sucrose solution (group 2, n = 10), 1 ml sterile water with pacifier (group 3, n = 9), or 1 ml 33% sucrose solution with pacifier (group 4, n = 11). Examinations were videotaped. Two observers, blind to the intervention, assessed recordings. Pain responses were scored using the premature infant pain profile (PIPP).

Results: The groups were similar in gestation, birth weight, and age at examination. Mean PIPP scores were 15.3, 14.3, 12.3, and 12.1 for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Analysis of variance showed a significant difference in PIPP score between groups (p = 0.023). Infants randomised to pacifiers scored lower than those without pacifiers (p = 0.003). There was no difference between groups receiving sucrose and those receiving water (p = 0.321).

Conclusions: Non-nutritive sucking reduced distress responses in infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity. The difference in response was large enough to be detected by a validated assessment tool. No synergistic effect of sucrose and pacifier was apparent in this group.

Keywords: premature; retinopathy of prematurity; pain; sucrose


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F157. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kleberg, A., Warren, I., Norman, E., Morelius, E., Berg, A.-C., Mat-Ali, E., Holm, K., Fielder, A., Nelson, N., Hellstrom-Westas, L. (2008). Lower Stress Responses After Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program Care During Eye Screening Examinations for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Randomized Study. Pediatrics 121: e1267-e1278 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Harrop, J E. (2007). Management of pain in childhood. EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 92: ep101-ep108 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs