Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 17 January 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.081927
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F197-F201
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.081927v1
91/3/F197    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M R
Right arrow Articles by Greenough, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, M R
Right arrow Articles by Greenough, A

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Respiratory function of very prematurely born infants at follow up: influence of sex

M R Thomas1, L Marston2, G F Rafferty1, S Calvert3, N Marlow4, J L Peacock2, A Greenough1

1 Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, Guy’s King’s & St Thomas’ Medical School, King’s College London, UK
2 School of Health Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
3 Department of Child Health, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK
4 Department of Child Health, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Greenough
Department of Child Health, 4th Floor Golden Jubilee Wing, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK; anne.greenough{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objective: To test the hypothesis that male compared with female prematurely born infants would have worse lung function at follow up.

Design: Prospective follow up study.

Setting: Tertiary neonatal intensive care units

Patients: Seventy six infants, mean (SD) gestational age 26.4 (1.5) weeks, from the United Kingdom oscillation study.

Interventions: Lung function measurements at a corrected age of 1 year.

Main outcome measures: Airways resistance (Raw) and functional residual capacity (FRCpleth) measured by whole body plethysmography, specific conductance (sGaw) calculated from Raw and FRCpleth, and FRC measured by a helium gas dilution technique (FRCHe).

Results: The 42 male infants differed significantly from the 34 female infants in having a lower birth weight for gestation, requiring more days of ventilation, and a greater proportion being oxygen dependent at 36 weeks postmenstrual age and discharge. Furthermore, mean Raw and FRCpleth were significantly higher and mean sGaw significantly lower. After adjustment for birth and current size differences, the sex differences in FRCpleth and sGaw were 15% and 26% respectively and remained significant.

Conclusion: Lung function at follow up of prematurely born infants is influenced by sex.


Abbreviations: FRCHe, functional residual capacity assessed using a helium gas dilution technique; FRCpleth, functional residual capacity measured by whole body plethysmography; Pao, pressure at the airway opening; PMA, postmenstrual age; Raw, airways resistance; sGaw, specific conductance

Keywords: prematurity; lung function; sex; plethysmography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. I. Klein, E. Bergel, L. Gibbons, S. Coviello, G. Bauer, A. Benitez, M. E. Serra, M. F. Delgado, G. A. Melendi, S. Rodriguez, et al.
Differential Gender Response to Respiratory Infections and to the Protective Effect of Breast Milk in Preterm Infants
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): e1510 - e1516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health