Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 7 February 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.087213
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F279-F282
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.087213v1
91/4/F279    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, E M
Right arrow Articles by Barrington, K J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dempsey, E M
Right arrow Articles by Barrington, K J

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit

E M Dempsey, F Al Hazzani, D Faucher, K J Barrington

Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Mcgill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Dempsey
Department of Neonatology, Coombe Women’s Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; edempsey{at}coombe.ie

Background: Endotracheal intubation in the neonate is painful and is associated with adverse physiological effects. Some premedication regimens have been shown to reduce these effects, but the optimal regimen is not yet determined.

Method: Data on semi-elective intubations were prospectively collected in the neonatal intensive care unit over a six month period. Patients received 20 µg/kg atropine, 200 µg/kg mivacurium (a non-depolarising muscle relaxant) followed by 5 µg/kg fentanyl.

Results: Thirty three patients were electively intubated during this time period. The primary reason for intubation was surfactant administration (53%). Median (range) birth weight, gestational age, and age at intubation were 1360 g (675–4200), 29 weeks (25–38), and 33 hours (1–624) respectively. Twenty two of the infants were intubated on the first attempt. Median duration from initial insertion of the laryngoscope to successful intubation was 60 seconds (15 seconds to 20 minutes). In 18 cases, the first attempt was by a trainee with no previous successful intubation experience, 10 of whom intubated within two attempts. Muscle relaxation occurred at a mean (SD) of 94 (51) seconds, and mean (range) time to return of spontaneous movements was 937 seconds (480–1800). Intubation conditions were scored as excellent using a validated intubation scale.

Conclusion: Effective analgesia can be administered and intubation performed with some brief desaturations, even when junior personnel are being taught their first intubation. In this first report of mivacurium for intubation in the newborn, effective bag and mask ventilation was easily achieved during muscle relaxation and was associated with excellent intubation conditions, permitting a high success rate for inexperienced personnel.


Keywords: premedication; intubation; mivacurium




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. D. Roberts, T. A. Leone, W. H. Edwards, W. D. Rich, and N. N. Finer
Premedication for Nonemergent Neonatal Intubations: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Atropine and Fentanyl to Atropine, Fentanyl, and Mivacurium
Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): 1583 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health