Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 4 July 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.092478
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2006;91:F398-F402
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow erratum
Right arrow Correction (v93,pF78)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2005.092478v1
adc.2005.092478v2
91/6/F398    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Booth, C
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, A D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Booth, C
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, A D
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sustainable use of continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants during the first week after delivery

C Booth1,*, M H Premkumar1,*, A Yannoulis1, M Thomson1, M Harrison1, A D Edwards2

1 Division of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Hammersmith Hospital, London

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
A D Edwards
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK;david.edwards{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Early use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) may reduce lung damage, but it is not clear how many extremely preterm infants can be cared for without mechanical ventilation on the first days after delivery.

Objectives: To describe our experience of nCPAP in infants born at <27 weeks’ gestation and to determine the chance of reintubation of this group of extremely preterm infants.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study examined the period from November 2002 to October 2003, when efforts were made to extubate infants to nCPAP at the earliest opportunity. Data were collected on all infants born at <27 weeks’ and gestation admitted to The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK. The chance of an individual infant requiring reintubation within 48 h of delivery was estimated, calculating the predictive probability using a Bayesian approach, and oxygen requirements at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age were examined.

Results: 60 infants, 34 inborn and 26 ex utero transfers, were admitted; 7 infants admitted 24 h after birth were excluded and 5 died within 48 h. The mean birth weight was 788 g and the gestational age was 25.3 weeks. Extubation was attempted on day 1 in 21 of 52 infants on ventilators and was successful in 14; and on day 2 in 14 of 35 and successful in 10 of infants extubated within 48 h of delivery survived to discharge. 5 of 23 infants on mechanical ventilation at 48 h of age were on air at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, and 12 of 26 of those were on nCPAP at 48 h of age. The probability of an individual baby remaining on nCPAP was 66% (95% CI 46% to 86%) on day 1 and 80% (95% CI 60% to 99%) on day 2. The smallest infant to be successfully extubated was 660 g and the youngest gestational age was 23.8 weeks.

Conclusions: Extremely preterm infants can be extubated to nCPAP soon after delivery, with a reasonable probability of not requiring immediate reintubation.


Abbreviations: BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; FiO2, fractions of inspired oxygen; LMP, last menstrual period; nCPAP, nasal continuous positive airway pressure; PaCO2, partial pressure of alveolar carbondioxide; PEEP, positive end expiratory pressure; PIP, peak inspiratory pressure; SpO2, arterial oxygen saturation


Related Article

To intubate or not—that is the question: continuous positive airway pressure versus surfactant and extremely low birthweight infants
N Finer
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 91: F392-F394. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. C. Eichenwald and A. R. Stark
Management and Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2008; 358(16): 1700 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. C. Halbower, S. L. Ishman, and B. M. McGinley
Childhood Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Clinical Update and Discussion of Technological Innovations and Challenges
Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 2030 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Caffeine Dosage
Vengudi S Sankar
Fetal Neonatal Ed. Online, 3 Nov 2006 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health