HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: adc.2005.089698v1 92/3/F189    most recent Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cooke, R. W I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cooke, R. W I Topic Collections Relevant Article

Conventional birth weight standards obscure fetal growth restriction in preterm infants

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Richard W I Cooke
School of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, University of Liverpool, Neonatal Unit, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK; mc19{at}liv.ac.uk

Background and objective: It has been suggested that fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with fetal maturation so that, compared with appropriately grown preterm infants, mortality and some neonatal morbidities may be reduced. The evidence for this is conflicting, and severe FGR has been shown to be harmful. In addition excessive growth has also been shown to be associated with poorer outcomes. As preterm infants are often also growth restricted, centiles for birth weights are distorted and may conceal the degree of growth restriction in a given infant. This study investigated whether using estimated fetal weights (EFW) might reveal the effects of hidden FGR.

Population and methods: Using a 25-year database of preterm admissions to a single neonatal unit the ORs for mortality and neonatal morbidities for z scores for birth weight above and below the mean were computed and compared with those computed for z scores for EFW.

Results: In 7898 infants born at less than 35 weeks’ gestation, the OR for mortality was lowest for birth weights between 1 SD and 3 SD above the mean, but was lowest for EFW between –2 SD and 0 SD below the mean. For periventricular haemorrhage, increasing FGR below the mean reduced the OR with both birth weight and EFW. Apparent reductions in OR for septicaemia, chronic lung disease, persistent ductus arteriosus and necrotising enterocolitis with birth weights of >1 SD above the mean were not seen with EFW. FGR of >–3 SD was associated with increased OR for necrotising enterocolitis with both birth weight and EFW.

Conclusion: Using fetal growth rather than birth weight standards gives a better indication of the incidence and role of FGR in neonatal disease.

Abbreviations: FGR, fetal growth restriction; NEC, necrotising enterocolitis; OR, odds ratio; PVH, periventricular haemorrhage

Keywords: birth weight; estimated fetal weight; growth restriction; mortality; morbidity

Relevant Article

Estimated fetal weights versus birth weights: should the reference intrauterine growth curves based on birth weights be retired?

Richard A Ehrenkranz
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F161-F162. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]