Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 29 September 2006. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.094078
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:347-350
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.094078v1
92/5/347    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassim, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Greenough, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kassim, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Greenough, A.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Sleeping position, oxygen saturation and lung volume in convalescent, prematurely born infants

Zainab Kassim, Nora Donaldson, Babita Khetriwal, Harish Rao, Karl Sylvester, Gerrard F Rafferty, Simon Hannam, Anne Greenough

Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, King’s College London School of Medicine, at Guy’s, King’s College and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor Anne Greenough, Children Nationwide Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, 4th floor, Golden Jubilee Wing, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9PJ, UK; anne.greenough{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objective: To determine whether the effects of sleeping position on lung volume and oxygenation are influenced by postmenstrual age (PMA) and oxygen dependency in convalescent prematurely born infants.

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: Tertiary neonatal unit.

Patients: 41 infants (21 oxygen dependent), median gestational age 28 weeks (range 24–31 weeks) and birth weight 1120 g (range 556–1780 g).

Intervention: Infants were studied both supine and prone at two-weekly intervals from 32 weeks’ PMA until discharge. Each posture was maintained for 1 h.

Main outcome measures: Pulse oximeter oxygen saturation (SpO2) was monitored continuously, and at the end of each hourly period functional residual capacity (FRC) was measured.

Results: Overall, lung volumes were higher in the prone position throughout the study period; there was no significant effect of PMA on lung volumes. Overall, SpO2 was higher in the prone position (p = 0.02), and the effect was significant in the oxygen-dependent infants (p = 0.03) (mean difference in SpO2 between prone and supine was 1.02%, 95% CI 0.11% to 1.92%), but not in the non-oxygen-dependent infants. There was no significant influence of PMA on SpO2.

Conclusion: In the present study, prone sleeping did not improve oxygenation in prematurely born infants, 32 weeks’ PMA or older and with no ongoing respiratory problems. However, the infants were monitored in each position for an hour, thus it is recommended that oxygen saturation should continue to be monitored after 32 weeks’ PMA to be certain that longer periods of supine sleeping are not associated with loss of lung volume and hypoxaemia.


Keywords: preterm; oxygen saturation; lung volume; bronchopulmonary dysplasia


Relevant Articles

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F329. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Placing preterm infants for sleep: first prone, then supine
Christian F Poets and Anette von Bodman
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F331-F332. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health