Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F408-F413; doi:10.1136/adc.2006.108670
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harding, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harding, D.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

REVIEW

Impact of common genetic variation on neonatal disease and outcome

David Harding

Correspondence to:
David Harding, University of Bristol, D Level, St Michael’s Hospital, Bristol BS2 8EG, UK; david.harding{at}bristol.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
The main aim of identifying gene–environment interactions is to provide insight into mechanisms of disease development and to identify patients with an inherent vulnerability to certain conditions. This in turn may allow patients to be targeted with individualised treatment based on the knowledge of their inborn susceptibility to specific conditions. This review describes the possible effects of common genetic variation on outcome in various conditions affecting the neonate. It focuses predominantly on studies of positive association rather than non-association to illustrate this potential influence and to highlight the potential for further study and intervention. The shortcomings of published association studies and the place of such studies in future research are also discussed.



Relevant Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F329. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health