HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: adc.2006.094359v1 92/6/F454    most recent Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in ADC Online Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCrossan, B. A Articles by Sweet, D. G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McCrossan, B. A Articles by Sweet, D. G Topic Collections Relevant Article

Selective fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk babies to reduce invasive fungal infection

¹ Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
² Department of Microbiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
³ Department of Pharmacy, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Brian A McCrossan, Regional Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BJ, Northern Ireland, UK; brianmccrossan{at}doctors.org.uk

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of selective fluconazole prophylaxis on incidence of invasive fungal infection and emergence of fluconazole resistance in neonatal intensive care.

Design: Retrospective study of very low birthweight (VLBW) babies (<1500 g birth weight) admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the period 1 year before and after the implementation of an antifungal prophylaxis guideline.

Patients: VLBW babies with an additional risk factor: colonisation of Candida species from surface sites with a central venous catheter; third generation cephalosporin treatment; or total duration of antibiotic treatment >10 days.

Fluconazole protocol: Fluconazole 6 mg/kg for 3 weeks. Dose interval is every 72 h during the first 2 weeks of life. Thereafter, dose interval is reduced to every 48 h until 3 weeks old when daily fluconazole is given. Fluconazole is administered orally when enteral feeding achieved.

Results: 121 and 107 VLBW babies were admitted to the NICU in the year before and after the guideline was implemented, respectively. Data were available in 110 and 102 charts. 33/110 and 31/102 babies were eligible for fluconazole prophylaxis in the period before and after guideline implementation. 6/33 babies eligible for prophylaxis developed culture proven Candida sepsis before compared with no (0/31) babies after the guideline was implemented (p = 0.03). One baby (1/31) did develop probable Candida sepsis in the post guideline implementation period. During both study periods all Candida isolates remained fully susceptible to fluconazole.

Conclusions: Selective antifungal prophylaxis has reduced invasive fungal sepsis in one NICU without evidence of fluconazole resistance emerging.

Abbreviations: ELBW, extremely low birth weight; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; VLBW, very low birth weight

Relevant Article

Fantoms

Martin Ward Platt
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007 92: F423. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]