Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 5 April 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.109488
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2007;92:F468-F472
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Car seat test for preterm infants: comparison with polysomnography

Dawn E Elder1, Letitia Russell4, Deidre Sheppard1, Gordon L Purdie2 and Angela J Campbell3

1 Department of Paediatrics, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
2 Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
3 Department of Medicine, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
4 Department of Child Health Services, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr Dawn Elder, Department of Paediatrics, WSMHS, PO Box 7343, Wellington, New Zealand; dawn.elder{at}otago.ac.nz

Objectives: To monitor preterm infants in a cot and a car seat and compare an observed car seat trial with polysomnography (PSG).

Design: Non-randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Regional neonatal unit.

Patients: Preterm infants before discharge.

Interventions: Nap PSG respiratory and sleep variables were measured including gastro-oesophageal pH. Nurse observations included respiratory distress, apnoea measured by apnoea alarm, oxygen saturation and heart rate. Infants were studied supine in a cot and then in a car seat. Nursing observations were compared with PSG during the car seat trial only. Criteria for failure of the PSG and observed tests were predefined.

Main outcome measures: Difference in respiratory instability between cot and car seat. Concurrence regarding failure of the car seat trial between nurse-observed data and PSG.

Results: 20 infants (median gestation 33 weeks (range 28–35 weeks; median postmenstrual age (PMA) at study 36.5 weeks (range 35–38 weeks)) were studied. There were sufficient car seat data on 18 infants for comparison. There were fewer central apnoeas and arousals in the cot than the car seat (p = 0.047 and p = 0.024, respectively). Airway obstruction was not more common in the car seat. Younger PMA at time of study predicted failure in both car seat (p = 0.022) and cot (p = 0.022). The nurse-observed test had low sensitivity for predicting PSG failure but more accurately predicted airway obstruction on PSG.

Conclusions: Immature infants exhibit respiratory instability in cots and car seats. A car seat test does not accurately detect all adverse events during sleep in the seat.

Abbreviations: PMA, postmenstrual age; PSG, polysomnography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Latest from ADC

 

ADC is co-owned by the RCPCH and is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics

BMJ Careers - Latest Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs