Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 11 July 2007. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.109512
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2008;93:F24-F28
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
adc.2006.109512v1
93/1/F24    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, J R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Groves, A M
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, J R
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Echocardiographic assessment of blood flow volume in the superior vena cava and descending aorta in the newborn infant

A M Groves1, C A Kuschel2, D B Knight2, J R Skinner3

1 Neonatal Unit, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, UK
2 Newborn Services, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
3 Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Services, Starship Children’s Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Dr Alan Groves, Neonatal Unit, Queen Charlotte’s and Chelsea Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS; alan.groves{at}imperial.ac.uk

Background: Clinical methods of assessing adequacy of the circulation are poor predictors of volume of blood flow in the newborn preterm. Doppler echocardiography can be used to assess perfusion at various sites in the circulation.

Objective: To assess repeatability of measurement of volume of superior vena caval (SVC) and descending aortic (DAo) flow.

Design: SVC and DAo flow volume were assessed four times in the first 48 h of postnatal life in a cohort of preterm (<31 weeks) infants. Within-observer and between-observer repeatability was assessed in a subgroup of preterm infants. Normative values were derived from 14 preterm infants who required <48 h respiratory support and 13 healthy term infants.

Results: Within-observer repeatability coefficient was 30 ml/kg/min for quantification of SVC flow, and 2.2 cm for DAo stroke distance. Measurement of DAo diameter had poor repeatability. Between-observer repeatability appeared poorer than within-observer repeatability. The fifth centile for volume of SVC flow in healthy preterm infants was 55 ml/kg/min and 4.5 cm for DAo stroke distance.

Conclusions: Echocardiographic assessments of volume of SVC flow and velocity of DAo flow have similar within-observer repeatability to other neonatal haemodynamic measurements. Between-observer repeatability for both measurements was poor, reflecting the difficulty of standardising these novel techniques. In this small cohort of preterm infants, SVC flow volume <55 ml/kg/min and DAo stroke distance <4.5 cm represented low or borderline systemic perfusion in the first 48 h of postnatal life.



Relevant Article

Fantoms
Ben Stenson
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008 93: F1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
A M Groves, C A Kuschel, D B Knight, and J R Skinner
Relationship between blood pressure and blood flow in newborn preterm infants
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2008; 93(1): F29 - F32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health