|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
OPEN OR SHUT CASE?
Despite much meticulous research we are essentially still in the dark on what to do about the patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants. Should the medical treatment approach be prophylactic, symptomatic, or haemodynamic? Should surgical closure take place early, late, or not at all? Brooks et al describe their experience where duct surgery is not available and suggest that the time has come for trials to determine whether surgical closure after failed medical treatment confers any benefit at all. In a perspective on the subject, Fowlie reminds us that there is no evidence that any treatment of patent ductus arteriosus results in long term benefit and repeats the call for further definitive studies.
See pages 190 and 235
THE ASHINGTON EXPERIMENT
Hall and Wilkinson review the "Ashington experiment", in which a new neonatal service was set up, run entirely by Advanced Neonatal Nurse Practitioners (ANNP) with no paediatric medical staff on-site. They highlight
Relevant Articles
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F190.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F201-f207.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F225-f228.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F229-f234.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F235-f239.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F240-f244.
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005 90: F245-f251.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T H M Fenton Asphyxia or just hypoxia? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2006; 91(3): F234 - F234. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |