Arch. Dis. Child

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in ADC Online
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward Platt, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward Platt, M
Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2005;90:F191-FF191
© 2005 Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition


PERSPECTIVES

Neonatal research

Participation in multiple neonatal research studies

M Ward Platt

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M P Ward Platt
Ward 35, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK; m.p.ward-platt@ncl.ac.uk


Doctors and members of ethics committees need guidance that is underpinned by sound evidence on parental attitudes to research

Keywords: consent; research; parent

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In recent years, the journal has carried several papers on parental consent (assent) for participation of their babies in clinical trials.1,2 This is important because Archives is read by many of those who organise neonatal research projects. The approach to parents is often fraught with ethical dilemmas.

Clinicians and members of ethics committees alike need guidance that is underpinned by sound research evidence on parental attitudes and beliefs about participating in research, rather than well meant assumptions about how parents might feel. Readers of the Journal of Medical Ethics would find little of direct use when confronted by the clinical realities and research questions of neonatal care—although this journal once published a neonatal study on the variability of ethics committee views. Rather, it is to specialist or general clinical journals that clinicians look for good information in relation to parental views and perceptions, and for an evidence base . . . [Full text of this article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. Maayan-Metzger, P. Kedem-Friedrich, and J. Kuint
Motivations of Mothers to Enroll Their Newborn Infants in General Clinical Research on Well-Infant Care and Development
Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e590 - e596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
ARCH DIS CHILD FETAL NEONATAL ED ED PRACTICE
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health