|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original articles |
1 The Hospital for Sick Children, Canada
2 Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Israel
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: turnerjd{at}rogers.com.
Accepted 22 February 2006
| Abstract |
|---|
Objective: To determine normal values of procalcitonin in preterm infants shortly after birth and to assess its accuracy in detecting bacterial infection.
Methods: Blood samples of 100 preterm infants were prospectively drawn during the first four days of life for procalcitonin levels. Infants were classified to four groups according to their infectious status.
Results: The infant's mean ± SD gestational age and birth weight were 32 ± 2.9 weeks and 1682 ± 500 grams, respectively. 283 procalcitonin values from healthy infants were plotted to construct nomograms of physiologically elevated procalcitonin after birth, stratified by two groups 24-30 and 31-36 weeks of gestation. The peak 95th percentile procalcitonin value was plotted at 28 hours of age and values return to normal after four days of life. Only 12 infants were infected and 13 of their 16 procalcitonin values drawn after birth were higher than the 95th percentile, while samples taken at birth were lower. In a multivariable analysis, gestational age, premature rupture of membrane and sepsis status influenced procalcitonin level independently but maternal infection status did not.
Conclusions: The suggested preterm neonatal nomograms are different than in term infants. Procalcitonin levels exceeding the 95th percentile may be helpful in detecting congenital infection, but not at birth.
Keywords: congenital infection, preterm newborns, procalcitonin, reference value
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | REGISTER |
| ARCH DIS CHILD | FETAL NEONATAL ED | ED PRACTICE |