rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;84:F117-F121 doi:10.1136/fn.84.2.F117
  • Original article

Respiratory distress syndrome and birth order in premature twins

  1. D Hackinga,
  2. A Watkinsa,
  3. S Frasera,
  4. R Wolfeb,
  5. T Nolan on behalf of Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Networkb
  1. aDepartment of Paediatrics, Mercy Hospital for Women, Clarendon Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia, bClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
  1. Dr Hacking, International Child Health Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UKdoug.hacking{at}imm.ox.ac.uk
  • Accepted 12 November 2000

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of birth order on respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in the outcome of twins in a large premature population managed in a modern neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS An historical cohort study design was used to analyse the neonatal outcomes of 301 premature liveborn twin sibling pairs of between 23 and 31 weeks gestation from the Australia and New Zealand Neonatal Network 1995 database.

RESULTS Among the 56 twin sibling pairs who were discordant for RDS, the second twin was affected in 41 cases (odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5 to 5.3). The excess risk of RDS in the second twin increased with gestation and was statistically significant for twins above 29 weeks gestation (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6 to 15).

CONCLUSIONS There is a significant increased risk of RDS associated with being the second born of premature twins, which appears to depend on gestation.

Footnotes

    Responses to this article

    • Re: Birth order and RDS : Some controversy in the literature
      • Doug Hacking
      Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed published online July 26, 2001
    • Birth order and RDS : Some controversy in the literature
      • N Naor
      Arch Dis Child - Fetal Neonatal Ed published online July 20, 2001

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.