rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001;85:F36-F41 doi:10.1136/fn.85.1.F36
  • Original article

Development and initial validation of the EDIN scale, a new tool for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants

  1. T Debillona,
  2. V Zupanb,
  3. N Ravaulta,
  4. J-F Magnyc,
  5. M Dehanb
  1. aNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Mother-Child University Hospital, Nantes, France, bNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Antoine Béclère University Hospital, Clamart, France, cNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Infant Care Institute, Paris, France
  1. Dr Debillon, Service de Réanimation Néonatale, Hôpital Mère-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, 44 093 Nantes Cedex 01, Francethierry.debillon{at}chu-nantes.fr
  • Accepted 26 January 2001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a scale suitable for use in clinical practice as a tool for assessing prolonged pain in premature infants.

METHODS Pain indicators identified by observation of preterm infants and selected by a panel of experts were used to develop the EDIN scale (Échelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-Né, neonatal pain and discomfort scale). A cohort of preterm infants was studied prospectively to determine construct validity, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency of the scale.

RESULTS The EDIN scale uses five behavioural indicators of prolonged pain: facial activity, body movements, quality of sleep, quality of contact with nurses, and consolability. The validation study included 76 preterm infants with a mean gestational age of 31.5 weeks. Inter-rater reliability was acceptable, with a κ coefficient range of 0.59–0.74. Internal consistency was high: Cronbach's α coefficients calculated after deleting each item ranged from 0.86 to 0.94. To establish construct validity, EDIN scores in two extreme situations (pain and no pain) were compared, and a significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS The validation data suggest that the EDIN is appropriate for assessing prolonged pain in preterm infants. Further studies are warranted to obtain further evidence of construct validity by comparing scores in less extreme situations.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Register for free content


    Free trial
    Individuals may register for a free 60 day online trial to all content.

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.