Table 4
Predicting low maternal satisfaction with the newborn examination using the maximum likelihood logistic regression model
| Factor | n | Crude odds ratio (95% CI) | Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| *p≤0.05, **p≤0.01, ***p≤0.001. | |||
| SHO, Senior house officer. | |||
| (A) Intention to treat | |||
| Intention to treat (midwife v SHO) | 313/645 | 0.54 (0.39 to 0.75)*** | 0.82 (0.57 to 1.20) |
| Healthcare issues discussed (yes) | 297/645 | 0.43 (0.30 to 0.60)*** | 0.49 (0.34 to 0.70)*** |
| Previous miscarriage (yes) | 135/645 | 1.68 (1.14 to 2.48)** | 1.61 (1.08 to 2.40)* |
| Newborn examination by midwife who clerked first antenatal visit (yes) | 95/645 | 0.33 (0.18 to 0.58)*** | 0.43 (0.23 to 0.81)** |
| (B) Actual treatment by SHOs v midwives | |||
| Status of examiner (midwife v SHO) | 291/645 | 0.56 (0.40 to 0.78)*** | 0.91 (0.62 to 1.35) |
| Healthcare issues discussed (yes) | 297/645 | 0.43 (0.30 to 0.60)*** | 0.48 (0.33 to 0.68)*** |
| Previous miscarriage (yes) | 135/645 | 1.68 (1.14 to 2.48)** | 1.61 (1.08 to 2.40)* |
| Newborn examination by midwife who clerked first antenatal visit (yes) | 95/645 | 0.33 (0.18 to 0.58)*** | 0.41 (0.22 to 0.77)** |
