rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003;88:F280-F286 doi:10.1136/fn.88.4.F280
  • Original article

Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study

  1. E Burgess1,
  2. N Singhal2,
  3. H Amin2,
  4. D D McMillan2,
  5. H Devrome3
  1. 1Office of Medical Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
  2. 2Division of Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary
  3. 3Faculty of Law, University of Calgary
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr E Burgess, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2T9;
    ellen.burgess{at}CalgaryHealthRegion.ca
  • Accepted 25 October 2002

Abstract

Background: Recruitment into research studies in the neonatal intensive care unit has been problematic. Therefore suggestions have been made to take decision making about enrolment out of the hands of the parents.

Objective: To understand parental perceptions of the process of recruitment and enrolment for research in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Method: A questionnaire was developed and used in both a retrospective survey and a prospective study of parents whose newborns were enrolled in trials in a neonatal intensive care unit. Closed ended and open ended questions were included, as well as demographic questions.

Results: The retrospective survey had a 79% response rate (29 of 38). Overall, 90% of parents felt that they had made informed decisions, and 93% were against the option that a doctor decide if the newborn should be enrolled into a study, rather than the parent. Although some parents (38%) found that recruitment did add “stress to an already stressful situation”, 90% felt that they had made informed decisions and understood the elements of the study. Most parents had been requested to enrol their newborn into more than one trial, and, on average, they thought that they would be comfortable with enrolment into two studies (range 0–6). When asked how the process could be improved, parents suggested that information be made available before delivery. The responses of parents in the prospective study were mostly consistent with those from the retrospective survey.

Conclusions: Overall the parents did not support the suggestion that decision making about enrolment be taken away from parents and put into the hands of doctors. The healthcare team should support parents in their role of decision maker, enhance availability of the research staff, and provide more information about the research.

Footnotes

    Relevant Article

    Latest from Education & Practice

    Latest from Education & Practice

    Register for free content

    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

    Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs