rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F305-F309 doi:10.1136/adc.2002.025270
  • Original article

Measurement of movement is an objective method to assist in assessment of opiate withdrawal in newborns

  1. C O’Brien1,2,
  2. R Hunt1,
  3. H E Jeffery1,2
  1. 1Department of Neonatal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2University of Sydney
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Jeffery
    Department of Neonatal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney 2050, New South Wales, Australia; hjefferymed.usyd.edu.au
  • Accepted 22 October 2003

Abstract

Objective: To develop an objective and reliable method to assess drug withdrawal in newborns by quantitatively estimating the amount of movement rather than scoring individual withdrawal signs.

Design: In this cross sectional study, a commercial portable motion detector with computer memory, similar to a wrist watch (the actigraph) was used to measure movement. The measurements were compared with a clinical decision based on the neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) score. Movement was analysed, using non-parametric tests, in three groups: a control group of 10 infants, 13 opiate exposed newborns not treated for NAS, and 30 newborns treated for NAS (17 before treatment, eight within 24 hours of treatment, five when stabilised).

Results: There were significant differences in the median activity score, expressed as counts per minute (cpm), in the pretreatment group (124 cpm) compared with the control (42 cpm, p < 0.0001), non-treated (74 cpm, p  =  0.001), and stabilised treatment (75 cpm, p  =  0.007) groups. The accuracy of the actigraph in the identification of newborns requiring treatment from those who did not was high compared with the clinical scores; sensitivity 94%; specificity 85%; positive and negative predictive values 88% and 92% respectively.

Conclusions: The measure of movement is comparable to the clinical score in the identification of newborns who require treatment and in determining the severity of withdrawal. The clear advantage of this method is its objectivity, reliability, and efficiency as a simple, non-invasive, bedside measure. Further evaluation in a randomised, controlled trial would establish comparative benefits, potential harms, safety, and acceptability.

Footnotes

    Latest from Education & Practice

    Latest from Education & Practice

    Register for free content

    Free sample
    This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
    View free sample issue >>

    Free archive
    The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
    Register to access the free archive >>

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

    Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs