rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F252-FF256 doi:10.1136/adc.2004.055558
  • Original article

Does cranial ultrasound imaging identify arterial cerebral infarction in term neonates?

  1. F Cowan1,
  2. E Mercuri1,2,
  3. F Groenendaal3,
  4. L Bassi1,
  5. D Ricci2,
  6. M Rutherford1,
  7. L de Vries3
  1. 1Department of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
  2. 2Paediatric Neurology Unit, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
  3. 3Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Academic Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Cowan
    Department of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK; f.cowanimperial.ac.uk
  • Accepted 10 November 2004

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cranial ultrasound (CUS) for detection of neonatal arterial territory cerebral infarction in term infants.

Methods: CUS scans from term infants with neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of neonatal infarction were reviewed. The scans were grouped by acquisition time after birth: 1–3 days (early) or 4–14 days (late).

Results: Brain MRI showed infarction in the territory of the middle cerebral artery in 43 of 47 infants, anterior cerebral artery in one, and posterior cerebral artery in three. Twelve of the 47 had minor changes on MRI in the white matter in the contralateral hemisphere, and four infants had bilateral infarctions. The early CUS scans were abnormal in 68% of the infants; the late CUS scans were abnormal in 87%. The late CUS scans were correct for laterality and site of lesion in 25/47 (53%) infants. In six infants with smaller lesions of the cortical middle cerebral artery branch or lesions in the posterior cerebral artery territory, the CUS scans were persistently normal.

Conclusion: Normal early CUS scans do not exclude a diagnosis of neonatal stroke, although most scans are abnormal. CUS scans performed after day 3 were abnormal in 87% of infants. CUS scan findings were accurate for lesion laterality and site in 53%, and, in 34%, the scans showed abnormality strongly suggestive of infarction but not always site specific. For optimal prognostic information, infants with clinical histories or CUS scan findings suggestive of infarction should have a neonatal brain MRI scan.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.