rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F392-F396 doi:10.1136/adc.2004.064691
  • Original article

Neonatal resuscitation 2: an evaluation of manual ventilation devices and face masks

  1. C P F O’Donnell1,
  2. P G Davis1,
  3. R Lau1,
  4. P A Dargaville2,
  5. L W Doyle1,
  6. C J Morley1
  1. 1Royal Women’s Hospital Melbourne, Victoria 3053, Australia
  2. 2Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr O’Donnell
    Royal Women’s Hospital Melbourne, 132 Grattan Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia; colm.odonnellrwh.org.au
  • Accepted 18 March 2005
  • Published Online First 4 May 2005

Abstract

Background: The key to successful neonatal resuscitation is effective ventilation. Little evidence exists to guide clinicians in their choice of manual ventilation device or face mask. The expiratory tidal volume measured at the mask (VTE(mask)) is a good estimate of the tidal volume delivered during simulated neonatal resuscitation.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of (a) the Laerdal infant resuscitator and the Neopuff infant resuscitator, used with (b) round and anatomically shaped masks in a model of neonatal resuscitation.

Methods: Thirty four participants gave positive pressure ventilation to a mannequin at specified pressures with each of the four device-mask combinations. Flow, inspiratory tidal volume at the face mask (VTI(mask)), VTE(mask), and airway pressure were recorded. Leakage from the mask was calculated from VTI(mask) and VTE(mask).

Results: A total of 10 780 inflations were recorded and analysed. Peak inspiratory pressure targets were achieved equally with the Laerdal and Neopuff resuscitators. Positive end expiratory pressure was delivered with the Neopuff but not the Laerdal device. Despite similar peak pressures, VTE(mask) varied widely. Mask leakage was large for each combination of device and mask. There were no differences between the masks.

Conclusion: During face mask ventilation of a neonatal resuscitation mannequin, there are large leaks around the face mask. Airway pressure is a poor proxy for volume delivered during positive pressure ventilation through a mask.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 4 May 2005

  • Competing interests: none declared

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. adc.2004.064691v1
    2. 90/5/F392 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education & Practice

Latest from Education & Practice

Register for free content

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

    Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs