rss

This article has a correction

Please see: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F390

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F251-F256 doi:10.1136/adc.2005.090670
  • Original article

Does rural or urban residence make a difference to neonatal outcome in premature birth? A regional study in Australia

  1. M E Abdel-Latif1,2,
  2. B Bajuk3,
  3. J Oei1,2,
  4. T Vincent3,
  5. L Sutton1,2,
  6. K Lui1,2,
  7. on behalf of the Neonatal Intensive Care Units Group
  1. 1Department of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, NSW, Australia
  2. 2School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW
  3. 3Neonatal Intensive Care Units Data Collection, NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, NSW Pregnancy and Newborn Services Network, Sydney
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Lui
    Department of Newborn Care, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Locked Bag 2000, Randwick, 2031 NSW, Australia; k.lui{at}unsw.edu.au
  • Accepted 12 January 2006
  • Published Online First 20 January 2006

Abstract

Background: Patients living in rural areas may be at a disadvantage in accessing tertiary health care.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that very premature infants born to mothers residing in rural areas have poorer outcomes than those residing in urban areas in the state of New South Wales (NSW) and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) despite a coordinated referral and transport system.

Methods: “Rural” or “urban” status was based on the location of maternal residence. Perinatal characteristics, major morbidity and case mix adjusted mortality were compared between 1879 rural and 6775 urban infants <32 weeks gestational age, born in 1992–2002 and admitted to all 10 neonatal intensive care units in NSW and ACT.

Results: Rural mothers were more likely to be teenaged, indigenous, and to have had a previous premature birth, prolonged ruptured membrane, and antenatal corticosteroid. Urban mothers were more likely to have had assisted conception and a caesarean section. More urban (93% v 83%) infants were born in a tertiary obstetric hospital. Infants of rural residence had a higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.48, p  =  0.005). This trend was consistently seen in all subgroups and significantly for the tertiary hospital born population and the 30–31 weeks gestation subgroup. Regional birth data in this gestational age range also showed a higher stillbirth rate among rural infants (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.32, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Premature births from rural mothers have a higher risk of stillbirth and mortality in neonatal intensive care than urban infants.

Footnotes

  • Published online first 20 January 2006

  • Competing interests: none declared

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. A correction has been published
  5. Correction
  6. All versions of this article:
    1. adc.2005.090670v1
    2. 91/4/F251 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.