rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F257-F262 doi:10.1136/adc.2005.074476
  • Original article

Low prevalence of hearing impairment among very low birthweight infants as detected by universal neonatal hearing screening

  1. D Ari-Even Roth1,2,
  2. M Hildesheimer1,2,
  3. A Maayan-Metzger3,
  4. C Muchnik1,2,
  5. A Hamburger1,
  6. R Mazkeret3,
  7. J Kuint3
  1. 1Speech and Hearing Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer 52621, Israel
  2. 2Department of Communication Disorders, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Hashomer
  3. 3Department of Neonatology, Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Ari-Even Roth
    Speech and Hearing Center, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 52621; rothd{at}post.tau.ac.il
  • Accepted 27 January 2006
  • Published Online First 10 March 2006

Abstract

Objectives: To (a) study the prevalence of hearing impairment in a cohort of very low birthweight (VLBW) infants and (b) evaluate the effectiveness of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) as a first stage in-hospital hearing screening tool in this population.

Study design: The study group was a cohort of 346 VLBW infants born in 1998–2000 at The Sheba Medical Center. The prevalence of hearing impairment in the study group was compared with that of all other newborn infants participating in a universal newborn hearing screening programme during the same period. To evaluate the effectiveness of TEOAE, a control group of 1205 healthy newborns who had no known risk factors for hearing impairment was selected. The results and follow up of hearing screening for these infants were examined retrospectively.

Results: Only one VLBW infant (0.3%) was diagnosed with bilateral sensory-neural hearing loss. In addition, nine infants (2.7%) were diagnosed with conductive hearing loss. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and low Apgar score were the most significant factors for predicting the occurrence of conductive hearing loss. The percentage of VLBW infants who successfully passed the in-hospital TEOAE screening was 87.2, compared with 92.2% in the full term control group. No false negative cases were detected on follow up.

Conclusions: The study shows a low incidence of sensory-neural hearing loss in a cohort of VLBW infants and a relatively high incidence of conductive hearing loss. TEOAE screening was found to be an effective first stage in-hospital hearing screening tool in this population.

Footnotes

  • Published Online First 10 March 2006

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.