rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F374-F376 doi:10.1136/adc.2005.075036
  • Review

Consent for neonatal research

  1. L McKechnie,
  2. A B Gill
  1. Peter Congdon Neonatal Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr Gill
    Peter Congdon Neonatal Unit, C Floor, Clarendon Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Belmont Grove, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK; bryan.gill{at}leedsth.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 15 December 2005

Abstract

Inherent to all medical research is respect for the rights of the individual. Neonatal research is made more complex by the issue of proxy consent. Obtaining valid informed consent for entry of an infant into a research project needs to deal with this complexity. New evidence on the role and responsibilities of parents in giving consent has implications for all clinical staff that are considering embarking on and/or recruiting infants in research projects. This review explores the issues around informed consent for neonatal research and provides a framework by which consent could be improved. It is to be hoped that such improvements to the process will increase recruitment of infants to research studies while enhancing the validity of the consent process.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: none declared

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.