rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008;93:F275-F279 doi:10.1136/adc.2007.121285
  • Original article

Lung deposition after inhalation with various nebulisers in preterm infants

  1. E Köhler,
  2. G Jilg,
  3. S Avenarius,
  4. G Jorch
  1. Department of Paediatrics, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
  1. Dr E Köhler, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität, Medizinische Fakultät, Kinderklinik, Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany; elke.koehler{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
  • Accepted 3 January 2008
  • Published Online First 11 January 2008

Abstract

Aim: To compare pulmonary deposition after inhalation with three different nebulisers in preterm infants under conditions relevant to practice.

Methods: The relative lung deposition (bioavailability) was estimated by inhalation of the marker substance, sodium cromoglycate (SCG), and measurement of urinary excretion of SCG. Seventeen spontaneously breathing preterm infants received 20 mg of SCG as nebuliser solution by means of (a) an LC Star jet nebuliser; (b) an LS 290 ultrasonic nebuliser; and (c) a Projet ultrasonic nebuliser in a randomised three-period, crossover design. Serial urine samples were collected until about 12 hours after inhalations, and the excreted SCG was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Results: The mean (SD) total amounts of SCG excreted in urine measured after inhalation with the LC Star nebuliser (0.089 (0.036) mg) were significantly higher than those obtained with the LS 290 (0.055 (0.019) mg) or the Projet nebuliser (0.046 (0.025) mg). The average pulmonary deposition after inhalation using the LC Star, LS 290 and Projet devices was estimated as 0.89%, 0.55% and 0.46% of the nominal dose, respectively.

Conclusion: Inhalation with the LC Star jet nebuliser producing the greatest proportion of droplets <2 μm yielded a higher lung deposition in preterm infants than the LS 290 and Projet ultrasonic nebulisers.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: Approved by the human ethics committee of the Otto von Guericke University’s Medical Faculty

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. adc.2007.121285v1
    2. 93/4/F275 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education & Practice

Latest from Education & Practice

Register for free content

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

    Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs