Explaining educational inequalities in preterm birth: the generation r study
- P W Jansen1,2,3,
- H Tiemeier3,4,
- V W V Jaddoe1,4,5,
- A Hofman4,
- E A P Steegers6,
- F C Verhulst3,
- J P Mackenbach2,
- H Raat2
- 1The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 2Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 3Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 4Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 5Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- P W Jansen, The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040 (Room Ae-029), 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; p.w.jansen{at}erasmusmc.nl
- Accepted 26 May 2008
- Published Online First 18 June 2008
Abstract
Background: Although a low socioeconomic status has consistently been associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, little is known about the pathways through which socioeconomic disadvantage influences preterm birth.
Aim: To examine mechanisms that might underlie the association between the educational level of pregnant women as an indicator of socioeconomic status, and preterm birth.
Methods: The study was nested in a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Information was available for 3830 pregnant women of Dutch origin.
Findings: The lowest-educated pregnant women had a statistically significant higher risk of preterm birth (odds ratio (OR) = 1.89 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.80)) than the highest educated women. This increased OR was reduced by up to 22% after separate adjustment for age, height, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, financial concerns, long-lasting difficulties, psychopathology, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and body mass index (BMI) of the pregnant women. Joint adjustment for these variables resulted in a reduction of 89% of the increased risk of preterm birth among low-educated pregnant women (fully adjusted OR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.84)).
Conclusions: Pregnant women with a low educational level have a nearly twofold higher risk of preterm birth than women with a high educational level. This elevated risk could largely be explained by pregnancy characteristics, indicators of psychosocial well-being, and lifestyle habits. Apparently, educational inequalities in preterm birth go together with an accumulation of multiple adverse circumstances among women with a low education. A number of explanatory mechanisms unravelled in the present study seem to be modifiable by intervention programmes.
Footnotes
-
None.
The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, has approved the study.
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
-
The present study was supported by an additional grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW “Geestkracht” program 10.000.1003).








