rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F28-F34 doi:10.1136/adc.2007.136945
  • Original article

Explaining educational inequalities in preterm birth: the generation r study

  1. P W Jansen1,2,3,
  2. H Tiemeier3,4,
  3. V W V Jaddoe1,4,5,
  4. A Hofman4,
  5. E A P Steegers6,
  6. F C Verhulst3,
  7. J P Mackenbach2,
  8. H Raat2
  1. 1
    The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2
    Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3
    Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  4. 4
    Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  5. 5
    Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  6. 6
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. P W Jansen, The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040 (Room Ae-029), 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; p.w.jansen{at}erasmusmc.nl
  • Accepted 26 May 2008
  • Published Online First 18 June 2008

Abstract

Background: Although a low socioeconomic status has consistently been associated with an increased risk of preterm birth, little is known about the pathways through which socioeconomic disadvantage influences preterm birth.

Aim: To examine mechanisms that might underlie the association between the educational level of pregnant women as an indicator of socioeconomic status, and preterm birth.

Methods: The study was nested in a population-based cohort study in the Netherlands. Information was available for 3830 pregnant women of Dutch origin.

Findings: The lowest-educated pregnant women had a statistically significant higher risk of preterm birth (odds ratio (OR) = 1.89 (95% CI 1.28 to 2.80)) than the highest educated women. This increased OR was reduced by up to 22% after separate adjustment for age, height, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, financial concerns, long-lasting difficulties, psychopathology, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and body mass index (BMI) of the pregnant women. Joint adjustment for these variables resulted in a reduction of 89% of the increased risk of preterm birth among low-educated pregnant women (fully adjusted OR = 1.10 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.84)).

Conclusions: Pregnant women with a low educational level have a nearly twofold higher risk of preterm birth than women with a high educational level. This elevated risk could largely be explained by pregnancy characteristics, indicators of psychosocial well-being, and lifestyle habits. Apparently, educational inequalities in preterm birth go together with an accumulation of multiple adverse circumstances among women with a low education. A number of explanatory mechanisms unravelled in the present study seem to be modifiable by intervention programmes.

Footnotes

  • None.

    The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, has approved the study.

    Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

  • The present study was supported by an additional grant from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW “Geestkracht” program 10.000.1003).

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.