rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F80-F83 doi:10.1136/adc.2007.123679
  • Original article

The effect of two levels of pressure support ventilation on tidal volume delivery and minute ventilation in preterm infants

  1. S Gupta1,
  2. S K Sinha2,
  3. S M Donn3
  1. 1
    University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
  2. 2
    University of Durham, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
  3. 3
    Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Smdonnmd@med.umich.edu
  1. Sunil K Sinha, Professor of Paediatrics, University of Durham, Consultant in Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK; Sunil.sinha{at}stees.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 3 July 2008
  • Published Online First 1 August 2008

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of different levels of pressure support ventilation (PSV) on respiratory parameters in preterm infants during the weaning phase of mechanical ventilation.

Design/methods: In this quasi-experimental crossover study, a total of 19 154 breaths were analysed from 10 ventilated infants of <32 weeks’ gestation. Breath-to-breath data on minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory rate, peak inspiratory pressure and mean airway pressure were collected during three study epochs: synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) alone, SIMV with partial PSV (PSmin), and SIMV with full PSV (PSmax). PSmin was set to provide an exhaled tidal volume (VTe) between 2.5–4 ml/kg and PSmax 5–8 ml/kg VTe. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures.

Results: The addition of full PSV (PSmax) was associated with a significant increase in total minute ventilation as compared with SIMV alone (392 ml/kg/min vs 270 ml/kg/min, respectively; p<0.05). This difference in minute ventilation was still present when PSmin was used (332 ml/kg/min as compared with 270 ml/kg/min in SIMV; p<0.05). There was also a concomitant decrease in the respiratory rate with both PSmax (59 breaths per minute) and PSmin (65 breaths per minute) compared with SIMV alone (72 breaths per min) (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Pressure support ventilation increases total minute ventilation and stabilises breathing in proportion to the level of pressure support used. This may be advantageous and provide a useful ventilation strategy for use during weaning stages of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Patient consent: Written informed consent was obtained from each parent prior to study entry.

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. adc.2007.123679v1
    2. 94/2/F80 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education & Practice

Latest from Education & Practice

Register for free content

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Fetal & Neonatal.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for ADC Fetal & Neonatal. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs

    Paediatrics and Paediatric Surgery Jobs