rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F245-F248 doi:10.1136/adc.2008.148981
  • Original article

Randomised crossover trial of four nasal respiratory support systems for apnoea of prematurity in very low birthweight infants

  1. T Pantalitschka1,
  2. J Sievers1,
  3. M S Urschitz1,
  4. T Herberts2,
  5. C Reher1,
  6. C F Poets1
  1. 1
    Department of Neonatology, University Children’s Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
  2. 2
    Department of Mathematics, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
  1. Professor Christian F Poets, Department of Neonatology, University Children’s Hospital Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 7, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany; christian-f.poets{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de
  • Accepted 6 December 2008
  • Published Online First 8 January 2009

Abstract

Background: Apnoea of prematurity (AOP) is a common problem in preterm infants which can be treated with various modes of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). It is not known which mode of NCPAP or NIPPV is most effective for AOP.

Objective: To assess the effect of four NCPAP/NIPPV systems on the rate of bradycardias and desaturation events in very low birthweight infants.

Methods: Sixteen infants (mean gestational age at time of study 31 weeks, 10 males) with AOP were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial with a crossover design. The infants were allocated to receive nasal pressure support using four different modes for 6 h each: NIPPV via a conventional ventilator, NIPPV and NCPAP via a variable flow device, and NCPAP delivered via a constant flow underwater bubble system. The primary outcome was the cumulative event rate of bradycardias (≤80 beats per minute) and desaturation events (≤80% arterial oxygen saturation), which was obtained from cardio-respiratory recordings.

Results: The median event rate was 6.7 per hour with the conventional ventilator in NIPPV mode, and 2.8 and 4.4 per hour with the variable flow device in NCPAP and NIPPV mode, respectively (p value<0.03 for both compared to NIPPV/conventional ventilator). There was no significant difference between the NIPPV/conventional ventilator and the underwater bubble system.

Conclusion: A variable flow NCPAP device may be more effective in treating AOP in preterm infants than a conventional ventilator in NIPPV mode. It remains unclear whether synchronised NIPPV would be even more effective.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Ethics approval: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tuebingen University Hospital.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF
  4. All versions of this article:
    1. adc.2008.148981v1
    2. 94/4/F245 most recent

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.