rss
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2009;94:F249-F252 doi:10.1136/adc.2008.152769
  • Original article

Management of neonatal abstinence syndrome: a national survey and review of practice

  1. M J O’Grady,
  2. J Hopewell,
  3. M J White
  1. Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Dr Michael O’Grady, University College Hospital, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland; michaelogrady{at}physicians.ie
  • Accepted 7 January 2009
  • Published Online First 27 January 2009

Abstract

Aim: To ascertain the present management of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in neonatal units in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland.

Methods: Postal questionnaire to 235 neonatal units, with telephone follow-up of non-respondents.

Results: The response rate was 90%, and 96% of respondents had a formal NAS guideline. The median number of infants treated annually for NAS was 6 (range 1–100). The method of Finnegan was the most widely used scoring system (52%). Morphine sulphate was the most commonly used first line agent for both opiate (92%) and polysubstance (69%) withdrawal. Dosing regimens varied widely. Units using a maximum daily morphine dose of <400 μg/kg/day were more likely to require the addition of a second agent (76% vs 58%, p = 0.027). Phenobarbitone was the drug of choice to treat seizures secondary to both opiate and polydrug withdrawal in 73% and 81% of units, respectively. 29% of units allowed infants to be discharged home on medication. 58% of these allowed administration of opiates in the community and in almost half of cases this was managed by a parent. Mothers on methadone whose serology was positive for hepatitis B and/or C were four times more likely to be discouraged from breastfeeding.

Conclusions: The majority of units currently use an opiate as the drug of first choice as recommended. Doses utilised and second agents added vary significantly between units. Many of our findings reflect the lack of high-quality randomised studies regarding management of NAS.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Funding: None.

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.